Your 'thinking' is flawed on so many levels I don't know where to begin. But the simple fact remains: a major political leader, one who has been aggressively investigating the Bush White House as chairman of the powerful House Judiciary Committee (DemonRat John Conyers Jr of Michigan) is in bed with an (revolutionary communist) organization which openly advocates the violent overthrow of the American government. Yet, somehow, according to you, we shouldn't be worried about it. We should give him a pass because spineless republicans over the decades have allowed the lefties to create a climate in which the accusers are now the problem. Weird sh*t, man. I certainly hope there aren't many other people on our side who think like you (assuming you actually are on our side).
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2051660/posts?page=50#50
Your 'thinking' is flawed on so many levels I don't know where to begin. But the simple fact remains: a major political leader, one who has been aggressively investigating the Bush White House as chairman of the powerful House Judiciary Committee (DemonRat John Conyers Jr of Michigan) is in bed with an (revolutionary communist) organization which openly advocates the violent overthrow of the American government. Yet, somehow, according to you, we shouldn't be worried about it. We should give him a pass because spineless republicans over the decades have allowed the lefties to create a climate in which the accusers are now the problem. Weird sh*t, man. I certainly hope there aren't many other people on our side who think like you (assuming you actually are on our side).I always know someone's lost the argument when all they have is personal insults, but you've taken the cake, m'man.
You don't even realize I AGREE with you and am merely pointing out why the message isn't getting through. (Your note shows your complete lack of comprehension on so many levels--I'll just take one: "Yet, somehow, according to you, we shouldn't be worried about it. " I never said this, you're simply making things up. "We should give him a pass because"--because nothing. I never said we should give anyone a pass. Your defensiveness is truly weird, and blinds you to any kind of informed discussion. That you can't see this is pretty scary...but frankly, it makes me suspect you're incapable of seeing beyond your own "I am the only one who sees!" silliness.
To go further would be to descend to your level of insult instead of intelligent exchange--which is something you're incapable of, obviously. Sorry I gave you too much credit.