[average american student]

Farrell opines on Farah's new book "None of the Above." Looks back at what party above principle, and victory first did to conservatism under Bush I and II. Better to lose the election and succeed in waking up the folks ... than win the vote and lose the country.

[hsalaw]

Nice idea, but I’m not eager to be saying “President Obama” for the next 8 to 10 years, not in These 57 States.

[pissant]

While I have no intention of voting for McCain, currently there is no third party on the ballot worth voting for. If I’m not going to vote for McCain becuase of his horrible record on the 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, taxes, sovereignty, global warming, and terrorists’ ‘rights’, I surely will never vote for any of the surrender monkey psuedo conservatives or the communist democrat.

Duncan Hunter 08

[Domandred]

None of the above is voting FOR Obama. Now more then ever we gotta suck it up and vote against the Marxists instead of voting for a good candidate.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

In order for conservatives to get on board, McCain needs to do one the following:

(1) Select a young conservative for VP (Palin, Thune, Rounds)

(2) Renounce global warming, illegal immigration, campaign finance-reform

(3) Resign from the race and nominate Fred, Hunter or Paul

Otherwise - NO DEAL!

[Haddit]

I believe that an Obama win will keep the Dems and Pubs divided whereas a McCain win will bring the two to the left, a country were laws are arbitrary and a country that is headed down the socialist path.

I’ll be voting for Hunter.

[barb-tex]

So we are going to teach those rascals a lesson! What did they learn when George Wallace carried 5 states? (OK, not to let him finish the next race). How about Jug ears race, did they get the message? Will they get the message when the third party elects THE NEW PRESIDENT? No way.
barbra ann