Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdReform
For those 18 and over who cycle on public roadways, licensing and liability insurance should be mandatory.

You have just outed yourself as a Liberal by advocating more Government Regulation and more Taxes.

I am sure the Democrats could use you as a Block Captain for the upcoming Election.

77 posted on 07/29/2008 8:44:14 AM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: trumandogz

Maybe you can show me where in the constitution cycling on public roadways is a protected right. If I have to be licensed and insured to operate my vehicle on public roadways, why should adults 18 and older using cycling as means of transportation be exempt? Do cyclists have a responsibility to obey the rules of the road and pay for any damage they cause?

So let’s do away all driver’s licensing and insurance; that would be the conservative thing to do, eh?

BTW, by “more taxes,” if you mean road use taxes for cyclists, I’m not for that at all.


225 posted on 07/29/2008 10:58:31 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson