[Sgt Joe Friday 714]

It’s a miracle!

[chiefqc]

Maybe she did'nt want the child to burdened with any reference to him as the father, seeing as he is such a cheating, lying, arrogant, oh wait I seem to be digging up a description of our elected thieves, used car salesman and lawyers - forget it you know the whole story.

[stinkerpot65]

Reille Hunter’s website:

http://web.petabox.bibalex.org/web/20060203013746/beingisfree.org/indexN.html

[Rutabega]

Ahhhh, folks. . .this not naming the father isn't nearly as interesting as it might be. If the father is not present at the hospital during the birth, and the parents aren't married, the hospital staff filling out the paperwork isn't allowed to name the father on the birth certificate. The mother will be given a form that the father can mail in (signed and notarized) and have his name added. This keeps mothers from naming anyone they please as the father, as this is the document that can be used in court to determine child support. Gee, that makes sense, doesn't it? We don't want moms to just name anyone they please on an official document that could make a man legally responsible for child support, without his agreement, would we?