Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government bans the word 'obese' to describe overweight children
Times Online ^

Posted on 08/04/2008 1:13:20 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Government bans the word 'obese' to describe overweight children Obesity is a growing problem in the UK

Parents of primary school children will start getting letters in September telling them how fat their children are. But however much they weigh, no child will ever be described as obese.

The Department of Health has found in surveys that the term obese is a turn-off, so instead will use the term “very overweight” for those children whose body mass index exceeds 30, in an attempt to enlist parents’ support.

Primary care trusts have been given a detailed set of instructions, and a sample letter, explaining how to convey to parents the results of the National Child Measurement Programme.

Among other words not to be used is “exercise”. Dr Will Cavendish, Director of Health and Wellbeing at the department, said that this, too, conveyed an unhelpful image to parents. Being “physically active” is preferred.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bmi; england; fat; fatkids; language; nannystate; obese; obesechildren; obesity; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
how PC.........
1 posted on 08/04/2008 1:13:20 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How long before the word “Overweight” is banned?


2 posted on 08/04/2008 1:15:36 PM PDT by Coffee200am ("We should all be living in mud huts and riding bicycles to avoid killing the polar bears..."/s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coffee200am

++good!


3 posted on 08/04/2008 1:15:56 PM PDT by Coffee200am ("We should all be living in mud huts and riding bicycles to avoid killing the polar bears..."/s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How about fatty twits?...................


4 posted on 08/04/2008 1:16:09 PM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

"How about 'fat bastits?"

5 posted on 08/04/2008 1:16:29 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So I guess calling them “dump truck” is out too?


6 posted on 08/04/2008 1:17:40 PM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Overweight, plump, portly, stout, chubby, paunchy, beer-bellied, heavy, bulky, chunky, well-upholstered, well padded, well covered, meaty, fleshy, rotund, broad in the beam; informal tubby, pudgy, beefy, porky, roly-poly, blubbery, corn-fed, abdominous.

7 posted on 08/04/2008 1:18:22 PM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Larda$$ always works for me.


8 posted on 08/04/2008 1:18:48 PM PDT by auboy (Men who cannot deceive others are very often successful at deceiving themselves. Samuel Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’m waiting for “slightly overly caloried, malnourishedly challenged pre-adolescent,” or some other lenghty, yet really soft mannered way of describing obese children.


9 posted on 08/04/2008 1:20:25 PM PDT by xc1427 (It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees...Midnight Oil (Power and the Passion))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

More sensitive PC from an England circling the drain.


10 posted on 08/04/2008 1:20:57 PM PDT by alarm rider (Peace! through superior fire power....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Government bans the word 'obese' to describe overweight children

Henceforth..., the term "Gravity Challenged" will be required and all former references to such children will constitute "Hate Speech" and "Hate Thought" the MINISTRY OF TRUTH has decreed!!!

11 posted on 08/04/2008 1:23:30 PM PDT by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auboy

Larda$$ always works for me.

Me too.....


12 posted on 08/04/2008 1:23:59 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How about “a beast”?


13 posted on 08/04/2008 1:24:23 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (I am voting for McCain because he is white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

so what is the punishment for using a banned word?


14 posted on 08/04/2008 1:24:37 PM PDT by a real Sheila (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Naturally non-anorexic.


15 posted on 08/04/2008 1:25:26 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Considering the situation AND location. . .

“double-plus weighted” ????


16 posted on 08/04/2008 1:25:26 PM PDT by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

I prefer “ham beast”. But that would upset the Mooselimbs...


17 posted on 08/04/2008 1:25:44 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Boy, is the UK on a downhill slide or what? We had better fight hard or we will soon be following.


18 posted on 08/04/2008 1:27:00 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

In other news, the word “blimp” has been banned from the English language......


19 posted on 08/04/2008 1:28:12 PM PDT by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I guess “tubby little piglets” would be out of the question then...


20 posted on 08/04/2008 1:28:28 PM PDT by Nachum (Obama: creepy you can count on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson