So, basically earlier this month I went on vacation and then when I came back, Techdude was out of favor due to a “meltdown”. I haven’t had the time to catch up till now to see what happened. I know you all are current on the situation, but I have been lagging and I now realize where all the freeper invective has been coming from. This guy Techdude was the perfect plant for messing up the whole thing, and the seeds of his poison fruit have been planted in the lawsuit of Berg vs. Obama. Once Hillary walks away from it, the whole thing will fall like a house of cards. That means the republicans will need to pick up where the democrats left off, but the evidence is getting so muddled that it would take any reasonable judge a couple of years to wade through it rather than a few weeks.
From Dr. Krawetz’ Hackerfactor:
http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/2008/08/04.html
Who is TechDude?
Updated 6-Aug-2008
Who is TechDude?
Updated 6-Aug-2008
I have heard from the person that TechDude is impersonating. TechDude is impersonating Adam Fink’s background and credentials. I offer a sincere apology to Mr. Fink for associating his impersonation with TechDude.
I previously wrote that TechDude’s declared background was similar to Mr. Fink, but not a perfect alignment with Mr. Fink, suggesting that it could be an impersonation. That indeed is the case.
It is important to recognize that TechDude’s analysis is misleading and fraudulent. Moreover, TechDude is impersonating a respected investigator. People should not harass Mr. Fink since he is yet another victim of TechDude’s deception.
Posted by Dr. Neal Krawetz in Image Analysis at 13:18 | Comments (71)
.
.
.
From Koyaan’s blog, (wasn’t there a Koyaan logging in here at Free Republic? )
http://koyaan.wordpress.com/2008/08/09/techdude-adam-fink-or-rat-fink/
Techdude: Adam Fink? Or Rat Fink?
August 9, 2008 in Uncategorized
UPDATE UPDATE: Seems she is.
Perhaps he’s using those qualifications because that is who HE IS.
END UPDATE UPDATE
UPDATE: Is TexasDarlin now effectively claiming that Techdude is in fact Adam Fink?
Actually, I have one other thought for Mr. Cannon:
If you are so sure about your allegation, why don’t you contact that real person and confirm that his i.d. has been ripped off. Since you’re such a cracker-jack detective, that should be a piece of cake for you to accomplish.
In fact, I’m surprised you didn’t do that before publishing your *breaking* accusation.
END UPDATE
Techdude:
As for me, my given name is Adam…
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/forensic-expert.html
Adam Fink:
Adam Fink
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/7/673/a58
Techdude:
20 years experience in the computer field…
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/20/techdude-obama-colb-is-a-forgery/
Adam Fink:
…20 years experience in the IT field…
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/7/673/a58
Techdude:
Board certified as a forensic computer examiner…
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/20/techdude-obama-colb-is-a-forgery/
Adam Fink:
…Board Certified Computer Examiner…
http://www.missouriforensics.com/index.htm
Techdude:
…handled the investigation of over 7,000 cases.
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/20/techdude-obama-colb-is-a-forgery/
Adam Fink:
…handled and investigated over 7,000 individual cases.
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/7/673/a58
Techdude:
Active member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, the American College of Forensic Examiners, Computer Forensics Volunteer Project, a Member of Federal Bureau of Investigation’s InfraGard program, International Information Systems Forensics Association, The International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners, and others.
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/20/techdude-obama-colb-is-a-forgery/
Adam Fink:
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, American College of Forensic Examiners, Computer Forensics Volunteer Project, Member of Federal Bureau of Investigation’s InfraGard Program, International Information Systems Forensics Association, The International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners.
PLEASE NOTE THE EXACT SAME GROUPS LISTED IN THE EXACT SAME ORDER IN BOTH INSTANCES
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/7/673/a58
Techdude:
Five years ago, opened his own computer forensic science lab…
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/20/techdude-obama-colb-is-a-forgery/
Adam Fink:
As the only privately funded Computer Forensic Science Laboratory in the State of Missouri…
February 19, 2008 As we approach our 5th year anniversary…
http://www.missouriforensics.com/index.htm
What are the odds?
I have heard from the person that TechDude is impersonating. TechDude is impersonating Adam Fink’s background and credentials. I offer a sincere apology to Mr. Fink for associating his impersonation with TechDude.
I previously wrote that TechDude’s declared background was similar to Mr. Fink, but not a perfect alignment with Mr. Fink, suggesting that it could be an impersonation. That indeed is the case.
It is important to recognize that TechDude’s analysis is misleading and fraudulent. Moreover, TechDude is impersonating a respected investigator. People should not harass Mr. Fink since he is yet another victim of TechDude’s deception.
I started looking over Koyaan’s posts. It’s too bad he was a troll and got zotted, because he had some good technical insights. I suppose it’s hard for people to be polite when they’re normally operating like an adam henry clymer.
Anyways, I found a way to look up his posts even though his account is banned:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:koyaan/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
Then I wandered over to his blog and it seems he has some unkind words to say about me, well, a guy who has a similar handle as me and happens to say exactly the same things I said in a thread... ;-)
So the long & the short of it is, he also says that the Berg vs. Obama forensic analysis is based upon Techdude’s fraudulent claims and the whole lawsuit is gonna go up in smoke. The whole thing could easily fall apart during the republican convention, which would be a high likelihood when we see how complicit the MSM is in upholding liberals.
Earlier this evening I started this exercise with the notion that we might have 2 weeks to have the baton handed off from PUMA to the republicans. But now I don’t think there is even enough time for a handoff, it would depend upon the republicans having a pair of cojones AND being fast moving. That would be a first.
Kevmoron
August 29, 2008 in Uncategorized | No comments
In my old thread over on Banana Republic, Milligan wrote:
How many forensic document experts examined OB BC?
Can’t rely on factcheck.org experts….conflict of interest here.
Kevmoron replied:
None. Because Obama hasn’t offered the document for examination. But there have been Technical Guys that have examined the electronic version offered on Obama’s FightTheSmears website and they’ve determined it to be a forgery. One of the premium examiners is the freeper Polarik.
And over on pissant’s thread, TheNewPundit wrote (in part) to Polarik:
You claim that no one has refuted your evidence, yet your evidence wouldn’t hold water in a court of law.
To this, Kevmoron replied:
It’s already holding water in a court of law, Berg Vs. Obama. The judge has not thrown out the lawsuit as trivial because the evidence is strong enough to consider.
The evidence is strong enough to consider?
What a rube Kevmoron is.
The “evidence” with regard to the COLB presented in Berg’s case is the “evidence” of the infamous Techdude. On his website Berg says:
My deepest thanks and appreciation our forensic analyst’s unwavering commitment to the truth despite the threats and harassment, the slashed tires and the dead animal on his porch.
The analyst is an active member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, American College of Forensic Examiners, The International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners, International Information Systems Forensics Association - the list goes on. He also a board certified as a forensic computer examiner, a certificated legal investigator, and a licensed private investigator. He has been performing computer based forensic investigations since 1993 (although back then it did not even have a formal name yet) and he has performed countless investigations since then.
Yup. That’s Techdude alright.
The same Techdude who was exposed as a fraud. The same Techdude who was found to have been fabricating his “evidence.” The same Techdude whose articles were pulled off both TexasDarlin and NoQuarter because even they could no longer deny that they had been duped.
And if Kevmoron doesn’t believe me, he can take it up with the “premium examiner” Polarik, who just this past Sunday over on Atlas Shrugs said this:
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but TechDude is a liar and a fraud who fabricated evidence, and outright stole the ideas of others.
So much for the case not having been thrown out because the “evidence is strong enough to consider.” The case wasn’t thrown out because Berg did not exercise due diligence and fed the judge a steaming pile of fraudulent bullshit. Something the judge will not be made aware of until after the defendants have been served and their motions to dismiss have been filed.
k
Wow, I missed all of that.
That Pam person (AtlasShrugs) swore up and down that she verified TechDude.
Interesting.
I have heard from the person that TechDude is impersonating. TechDude is impersonating Adam Fink’s background and credentials. I offer a sincere apology to Mr. Fink for associating his impersonation with TechDude.
Late to the parade? I outed him before anyone else did. Stealing someone else's credentials is not what got him into trouble. It was his hubris for thinking that nobody has ever seen a real 2007 COLB, so I'll just claim that it looks like 2006 & 2008 COLBs.
Whoops! Sorry, TechDude, but I have two of them, and yeah, they do look like the Obama COLB.
No surprise here, b/c I had already made allowances that they copied over the border and the background.