Two fleas were sitting on a dog.
One flea said to the flea: “There is no dog.”
“Two fleas were sitting on a dog. One flea said to the flea: There is no dog.
____________________
Interesting logic. Let me explain to you why it means nothing in this discussion.
We see the flea conversation as amusing, because we know there IS a dog, even though the fleas are unaware of it. We have the perspective to know the dog is there, even if the fleas don’t. If necessary, we can prove the dog is there, even if the fleas don’t see it.
Do I need to explain to you why that has nothing to do with your speculation that there is an invisible, supernatural deity?