You talk as though this matters.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Agreed. Even it is true, nothing will be done about it. Laws are meant solely to keep conservative taxpayers in line. Everyone else gets to do what they want and if you try to stop them then you’re a ______-ist!!
This is a more credible issue than the controversy about the certificate of birth.
ditto. He is The Messiah after all.
It’s not like anybody would have challenged the lineage of Jesus Christ if He were running for President (and he were actually black)......
Well, it might matter a lot. If the article is correct, and I have not researched that, then some resolution to the issue must be made and soon.
Seems to me there are two key issues (presuming the article is accurate with regard to the substance of the legislation addressed): 1) does the statute trump the currently-accepted but increasingly challenged view of born in the USA and “subject to the jurisdiction” thereof (unlikely, i.e., in my dreams); and 2) if so, whether the legislation has retroactive effect. The author say “no.” I think this issue is more important than a dispute about “raised “ seals on Hussein’s birth certificate.
I could see HRC using this with extreme relish.
One thing is clear, as I sometimes tell my USA-naturalized Cuban-born friend when he becomes uppity, he can’t be president and I can. Understandably, he gets po’ed when I say that.
It will become relevant if the Hillary bots bring it up at the Dem convention.
Hey Obama, did your Grandma give you your real birth certificate?
It all only matters if there are legal challenges to Hussein being on the ballot in the individual states. I don’t see that happening yet.