Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver

I think they can if they have a good reason. The lack of bids is a pretty good reason.


4 posted on 08/11/2008 7:09:07 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg

‘I think they can if they have a good reason. The lack of bids is a pretty good reason.”

Its far too complicated to discuss in this forum and I am certainly no expert. In general the govt cannot sole source if there is more than one qualified company. Even then sole source contracts get an incredible amount of attention and most agencies are cracking down.

Something this large cannot be sole sourced for many reasons. Lack of bids would force the government to extend the response date. That is probably what Boeing really wants.


5 posted on 08/11/2008 7:14:04 AM PDT by driftdiver (No More Obama - The corruption hasnÂ’t changed despite all our hopes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg; driftdiver
The lack of bids is a pretty good reason

Yeah, there can be a verdict if Boeing pleads Nolo contendere

7 posted on 08/11/2008 7:15:32 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (So there you have it : Eliza Dushku has made my naughty list for the year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

“Attempted competition” works at subcontract level but this is a pot load of money to be spent...on the other hand, original award to EADS has not been terminated and they could (?) simply go ahead and negotiate on that basis.


30 posted on 08/11/2008 11:08:17 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson