Posted on 08/13/2008 12:07:49 AM PDT by neverdem
Notice how the truth has been labeled “smears”.
Reading the article, it appears the NYT is more than a little concerned about this book, as well they should be.
Mr. Obama is Christian Yeah, yeah. Just as they never missed an opportunity to tell us that John Kerry was a Vietnam war hero.
Notice how the truth has been labeled smears.I notice that "I am a Christian" is this election's version of "I served in Vietnam."
Corsi’s book is #1 on Amazon, and #1 on the NYTimes Non Fiction Bestseller List.
They probably won’t even review it in their hallowed Book section.
In its timing, authorship and style of reporting, the book is strikingly reminiscent of the one Mr. Corsi wrote with John ONeill about Mr. Kerry, Unfit for Command, which included various accusations that were ultimately undermined by news reports pointing out the contradictions. (Some critics of Mr. Kerry quoted in the book had earlier praised his bravery in incidents they were now asserting he had fabricated; one had earned a medal for bravery in a gun battle he accused Mr. Kerry of concocting.)
So the authors say that Corsi's accusations were "undermined" by "news reports" which pointed out "contradictions." The authors assert that quoted accusations were made by people who had previously praised Kerry for his bravery, one even received the medal for action in a gunbattle which he said Kerry had "concocted." If these allegations can be shown to be without substance, the entire thrust of the article falls. On the other hand, these authors insist that because these allegations do stand, Corsi falls.
It has been a long time since I read the extensive threads here on FreeRepublic which minutely detailed the allegations, the rebuttals, and the sur rebuttals. I can no longer remember the details but I am satisfied that every rebuttal was convincingly overcome with a substantial degree of credibility and that the allegations against Kerry withstood the trial by Internet. I was very impressed the scholarship of many who posted here on FreeRepublic. If anyone has a citation which refutes the particular allegation set forth by the authors quoted above, now's the time to post them so that the record can once again be put right.
Some critics of Mr. Kerry quoted in the book had earlier praised his braveryKind of like this?
The NY Times must be in panic mode.
Since when has the Times ever used Christianity as a positive virtue?
911°? NYT's ignition temperature is nearing ambient.
These would be the same "news reports" that found "contradictions" in the Scott McCellen book or any of the hundreds of Bush bashing books.
There is no doubt Obama is a candidate not at all like he is attempting to portray himself.
The man is not only the most radical left-wing U.S. Senator (which is saying something), he is the most radical left-wing person to EVER run for President of the United States. He makes George McGovern look tame by comparison.
He has ties to a perfect storm of the most corrupt, racist, socialist and America-hating people you can imagine.
It is no wonder he has been endorsed by Fidel Castro, the government of Iran, the terrorist group Hamas, the U.S. Communist Party and a multitude of other America haters.
Obama and his consultant, Axelrod, are running a calculated and deliberate campaign of style over substance as an attempt to sell a candidate to the voters before they really can get to know his true positions.
He doesn't have much of a public policy record but what there is is VERY left-wing and radical.
As Corsi points out, his snake oil routine cannot con the majority of voters all the way through to the general election because issues do matter in the general elections in this country.
Obama seems to be campaigning like "Uncle Joe" Stalin, a "good guy" who is planning to rip us a new one once elected.
Although I ordered Obama Nation for my husband, I ended up reading it tonight... Well, I read the first half with the facts, and skimmed the second half with the opinions. Got O’s bio a bit straighter in my head, but then sank in the morass of trying to figure out if goo equals policy promises.
BTW, Churchill’s The Great Democracy (volume IV of his History of the English Speaking Peoples) has 100 pages of his analysis of our Civil War, cultural factors as well as military analysis of the strategies and tactics of the battles.
If you have a copy you might enjoy his discussions.
I was happy to hear him debunk the belief accepted by some here that the soldiers from the North did a lot of raping and murder while in the South.
Memo to the NY Slimes:
Black Liberation Theology is not Christianity. It is political hate speech and violent rhetoric.
They are nothing but birds of a feather of other hate groups who have nothing (absolutely nothing) to do with real cause of Christ.
I’m half way through it and agree with your assessment.
This book is nothing but a series of lies that were long ago discredited, written by an individual who was discredited after he wrote a similar book to help George Bush and Dick Cheney get re-elected four years ago, said Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for Mr. Obama.
Nothing in the Kerry information has been proving as a lie so I guess that means it was the Truth and THANK GOD we did get Pres Bush and VP Cheney for a second term.
That's a carefully crafted phrase, and the amplification (that contributors had switched from praise to criticism, and one person was given a medal for a "concocted" event) aren't substantive rebuttals of the charges in "Unfit for Command."
In other words, the sentence isn't asserting that "Unfit for Command" was false - just that it's contents was smeared by Kerry supporters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.