Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thefactor
that being said, a cop is taught to fire when someone is using or he believes will imminently use deadly physical force against them or someone else.

Wouldn't you also say that the cop should be firing AT something and not through tinted windows that he claims he couldn't see through?

181 posted on 08/13/2008 4:40:35 PM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (If given a choice between a POW and a POS, I'll take the POW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: Fundamentally Fair
"Wouldn't you also say that the cop should be firing AT something and not through tinted windows that he claims he couldn't see through?"

Frank Drebin says no.


182 posted on 08/13/2008 4:52:02 PM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair
well, here's the thing with that: you know someone is driving the car. and if you believe they are committing a major felony by using their car as a deadly weapon and you are responding with deadly force, you can just fire at the driver area.

if it is a justified shooting and a passenger in the car happens to get hit, the law kinda says, "too bad. you should not have been in the car with someone who was trying to kill someone else."

it's like a bank robber killing someone in a bank and they also charge the getaway driver with murder even though he never stepped foot in the bank.

188 posted on 08/13/2008 7:41:28 PM PDT by thefactor (contributing nothing of value to threads since 2001...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson