Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djsherin

Um, $223BN is a bit less than the dollars in circulation.

Just a weeeee bit.

Going back to the gold standard would tank the world economy.


8 posted on 08/14/2008 3:20:48 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: patton

The amount of dollars in circulation is less than the amount of US money in circulation (fractional reserve banking), but I agree the number couldn’t be $850 per ounce if it were to happen in one step. If you haven’t read the article and check out that site. I’ve learned a lot about monetary policy in general (not just about the gold standard) and it’s been extremely intriguing.


10 posted on 08/14/2008 3:24:39 PM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: patton

The world economy is a product of government, not free individuals.

It deserves to be tanked.


14 posted on 08/14/2008 3:31:23 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: patton
Going back to the gold standard would tank the world economy.

Going beck to the gold standard overnight would have a profound effect.

But the cause of our economy going in the tank would be the Federal Reserve printing all that paper money.

I believe that our economy is so precariously perched right now that if (WHEN) the people find out what our money is actually worth, all h-e-double-toothpicks will break loose.

21 posted on 08/15/2008 5:39:14 AM PDT by Designer (We are SO scrood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson