Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgia will lose South Ossetia, Russian president declares
The Guardian ^

Posted on 08/15/2008 7:42:49 AM PDT by maquiladora

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Freelance Warrior
S. Ossetia is a defacto Russian colony. But, that is beside the point. If you need a tunnel for a truck, you ain't driving a tank over it.

Roki Pass


41 posted on 08/15/2008 11:48:50 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Freelance Warrior

How about Georgia prommises not to invade S. Ossetia in exchange for every anti-tank and shoulder fire AA weapon we find in Iraq. Should be fair enough....they seem to need a few Kornets.


42 posted on 08/15/2008 11:51:04 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Looks to me like the Roki tunnel is indefensible to begin with. A single choke point that keeps Russia out of Central Asia. They need S. Ossetia as a staging point.
43 posted on 08/15/2008 11:56:06 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

It is a fine line you have to draw here. It is a fact that military targets have civilian infrastructure around them. If troops use towns as refuge or garrison themselves in them then there is nothing to say that they can’t be attacked.

The Argentines were using the capital Stanley to position artillery in and they were targeted accordingly. You also have to take into consideration weapons malfunctions. NATO aircraft carrying cluster munitions in Yugoslavia also hit civilian areas. NATO cluster munition went astray and landed miles away from the Yugoslav airfield. It is a sad fact, but it is a problem for all military commanders.


44 posted on 08/15/2008 1:23:47 PM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
How about Georgia prommises not to invade S. Ossetia in exchange for every anti-tank and shoulder fire AA weapon we find in Iraq. Should be fair enough....they seem to need a few Kornets

Do you really think they lack sholder weapons like this?

45 posted on 08/15/2008 4:53:59 PM PDT by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

The South Carolina’s failure in that war doesn’t necessarily mean that S.Ossetia shares its fate.


46 posted on 08/15/2008 5:07:56 PM PDT by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Freelance Warrior
Do you really think they lack sholder weapons like this?

They do now.

47 posted on 08/15/2008 7:01:07 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
Do you really think they lack sholder weapons like this?

A fighting side has the internationally legal right to confiscate such cargos. I believe if the USA proceed with this Russia will deploy navy searching all incoming vessels, bomb down any Georgian runways and will take control on Georgian border territories.

48 posted on 08/16/2008 3:01:24 AM PDT by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Freelance Warrior

Georgia has a right to defend itself, Russia has no claim to rights in Georgia.

But thank you. Your last few posts have pretty much demonstrated who we are dealing with in the new Russia.

ABM, Anti-Tank, and AA systems are only a threat to those intent on invasion=Russia.

Enjoy the new expanded NATO.


49 posted on 08/17/2008 9:26:24 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
Georgia has a right to defend itself, Russia has no claim to rights in Georgia.

Surely it has, but it doesn't have the right either to violate their previously signed treaties (like with Russia and South Ossetia on the armistice dated 1994) or shell civilian population.

At first, they started bombarding Russian peace-keeping personnel without any notice of leaveing the armistice treaty

Secondly, they started the war in a manner which is the most harmful for civilians.

50 posted on 08/19/2008 3:13:38 AM PDT by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson