"We're holding ourselves in reserve, in case the Georgians launch a counteroffensive that threatens Moscow or maybe Vladivostok."
Posted on 08/15/2008 11:38:33 AM PDT by maclay
I’m not going to be dragged down to your level. All you can do in justification is resort to personal insults. Does that give you some sort of self-satisfaction?
Your personal insults directed at me on this forum have been reported. It is clear that you can’t debate without the use of insults.
I kept waiting for the Kelly’s Heroes reference. Just “stop it with those negative vibes, man.”
When someone goes so far as to debase themselves by supporting Russian bank robbers they make their moral character an issue. If you don't want to be called amoral, then stop taking amoral positions.
“Prison vear!...Veddy nize!”
‘please remember to use common courtesy when posting and refrain from posting personal attacks’
You signed up to the above when you registered. Regardless if you disagree with a poster you simply can’t make up your own rules and start with personal insults.
Calling you an amoral invertebrate isn't a statement for the sake of insult; it is just a statement of fact, which you yourself readily admit to by your statements. You simply lack the ability to tell the difference between right and wrong. That you think you are being "impartial" by refusing to admit that it is wrong for Russians to be robbing banks just demonstrates the fact.
The reason my replies are more about you than about the original article is that your refusal to conform to even the most basic of human morality makes any further discussion of the issue moot until you come to your senses and recognize that there is no moral equivalence between an invader and the people being invaded.
That is your interpretation of events. You are twisting and inventing simply in order to achieve your version of a moral high ground.
‘please remember to use common courtesy when posting and refrain from posting personal attacks’
You signed up to the above when you registered. Regardless if you disagree with a poster you simply can’t make up your own rules and start with personal insults.
I refer you back to my previous post. Take some time to read it, think, and apply those actions to your posts. You are still openly emphasising the fact that you are breaking the rules that you signed up for.
This is a forum for debate. You either agree or disagree. It is not a forum for you to simply change the rules and resort to personal attacks. Obviously this has not been taken on board by yourself. It is a very simple rule.
Possibly it might make you think before resorting to personal abuse in the future - Possibly not? Nobody in this forum should be subjected to personal abuse and my actions in reporting it might stop your attacks on other posters in the future.
Yet again you have been reported for personal attacks.
Read the Rules!
No, those are the events. After the Russian invasion of Georgia, a lot of pro-Russian sycophants came up out of the underground like worms after a rainstorm. You just happen to be one of them, trying to defend the Russian position even in the face of overwhelming evidence. You can't even admit that robbing a bank is wrong when it is done by Russians.
Possibly it might make you think before resorting to personal abuse in the future - Possibly not? Nobody in this forum should be subjected to personal abuse and my actions in reporting it might stop your attacks on other posters in the future.
You still don't seem to get it. You ARE the issue now. You certainly have the right to express your pro-Russian views, but this forum does not guarantee your ability to do so without being called on it. By being such a spineless, amoral worm that you insist on being "neutral" when it comes to fundamental issues of good and evil, you change the focus of the argument to yourself. You can't express such vile mental illness and then expect not to be called on it.
Yet again you have been reported for personal attacks.
You do realize they're probably going to check your IP address (which I'm pretty sure they log) and see that you're probably a foreigner? At the very least, they're going to see that the nature of your posting changed the moment you realized your true nature was exposed.
Thanks for posting.
Yet again you have been reported for personal abuse.
Yet again you are spinning and interpreting for your own agenda.
Read the rules and abide by them. It is really quite simple!
Check my posting history. I am a UK citizen as I stated in a previous post. I am retired UK forces and served for 22 years. For much of those 22 years I served alongside US forces. The mods can check my IP address.
Thank you for replying.
Stating facts isn't personal abuse. Even now, you still refuse to admit that it was wrong for these Russian soldiers to rob a bank. You are defending Russians for doing what no moral person would even defend a member of their own family for doing. You are not being "impartial", you're just being amoral. Your sociopathic lack of common decency is relevant in this argument; in fact it is the central point of it. No progress can be made in this argument until you evolve a moral sense and come to the conclusion all reasonably people have that robbing banks is wrong. Russian soldiers don't get any special dispensation for such crimes just because you seem to admire their actions for some reason.
I am a UK citizen as I stated in a previous post. I am retired UK forces and served for 22 years.
I'm convinced you are lying. I've known quite a few UK officers in my day, and not a one of them was spineless like you, and not a one of them lacked the basic moral sense that is common to humanity. To a one, they could all tell the difference between right and wrong enough to know that robbing banks was wrong, a skill that you clearly seem to lack (or perhaps seem to only lack when the robbers are Russian).
Your defense of the Russian side of this conflict, going so far as to make excuses for Russian bank robbers, is evidence enough that you are either mentally unstable or a Russian sycophant.
"We're holding ourselves in reserve, in case the Georgians launch a counteroffensive that threatens Moscow or maybe Vladivostok."
LOL !!!
Stop it! All of you! These are the people President Obama wants to ‘dialogue with’.
Always with the negative waves Moriarty, always with the negative waves.
"Odd Ball, this T-80 is a piece of junk. It leaks fuel all over the place, the transmission is all fouled up, and it's so loud you can't hear yourself think."
"Always with the negative waves, Moriarty, always with the negative waves."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.