Skip to comments.Solzhenitsyn Biographer: Cross-In-Dirt Gulag Story Never Happened
Posted on 08/19/2008 1:38:38 PM PDT by flyfree
There's been a ton of buzz on the web for the last day or so -- beginning with this Daily Kos diary -- suggesting that John McCain patterned his story about a Vietamese captor drawing a cross in the dirt before him on a similar episode from Russian novelist Alexander Solzhenitsyn's time in the Soviet gulags.
But it turns out that this episode probably never happened to Solzhenitsyn at all, and according to a Solzhenitsyn biographer it appears nowhere in his published writing. Columbia University professor Michael Scammell, the author of Solzhenitsyn: A Biography, says the episode "never happened," and didn't appear in Solzhenitsyn's book, Gulag Archipelago, either.
(Excerpt) Read more at tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com ...
So now we know, this never happened to Solzhenitsyn, and there’s no way McCain could have picked it up from his works.
Not to mention McCain mentioned this seven years before Solzhenitsyn’s first book was in the US.
Where we must go to find someone to create a smear. The paranoia of the Left has spawned more than one industry designed to harm anyone who would dare have truck with Christians or Patriotic Americans for that matter.
So it’s a “made up” attack on McCain using a “made up” story about Solzhenitsyn. I guess for the leftists it’s hard to keep up with the lies.
Especially when it collides with their own faith in the dictatorship of the proletariat.
Plus McCain doesn’t need to make stuff like this up. Unlike Clinton (and Obama) who was a empty suit so he had to make up stories, McCain has plenty of background to draw on.
There is a lot I don’t like about McCain, but making up stories isn’t one of his shortcommings.
Oh, those silly KOmmies won’t let a little fact get in the way of a good conspiracy. This will hang out their in their alternate universe forever; just like Bush being wired during his 2004 election debates. Some things never end...
The left wingers are complaining that McCain never talke about this guard in the 1970’s.
Why WOULD HE ENDANGER THE LIFE OF THE GUARD?
The guard would have been tracked down and shot by the Communist North Vietnamese for 1) being a Christian and 2) helping an American POW survive prison camp!
No man or woman would want that on their conscience, leastways anyone with a conscience and the left appears not to have one.
Nice try... But like so much of the muck they try to throw McCain’s way, it ain’t true. McCain is though and Barry obviously isn’t and everybody is finding that out.
Unfortunately for the Democrat party, they’re finding it out way too late, and now have to live with their mistake, but I’m sure Hillary will spend the next 4 years explaining it to them over and over and over again.
According to another thread his campaign was just in Georgia doing some voter registration training.
...Oh, you mean THAT Georgia. Maybe they were there? By mistake, kinda? I wouldn't put it past them...
“It doesn’t necessarily rule out the possibility that McCain or his biographer, Mark Salter, picked up the tale that this happened to Solzhenitsyn elsewhere and embellished it for their own purposes.”
Unless the lefties can prove that this happened to Solzhenitsyn, I would assume that it is they who are lying—not McCain.
Daily Kos aint worth 2 bits to me. Bunch of stupid left wing wackos that should be deported to a gulag. Most will once Obama becomes president.
Not true. Over years in prison, McCain would have been guarded by hundreds of NVA. It would be impossible to figure out who it was with no more description than this.
Insofar as the issue is a Christian in the NVA, it's not far fetched at all. After a long period of French rule, there was a substantial Christian minority in Vietnam.
Next we’ll hear that McCain never was a prisoner of war, he was a guest of the NV govt. After all he stayed in the Hanoi Hilton, and we all know Hiltons are very nice hotels. And how could he afford staying in one for years on a pilot’s salary? Only if he was working with the commies could McCain stay there that long. Now that it’s been proven fact that McCain is a traitorous commie, I expect Andrea Mitchell and Chris Matthews to push this story right up to election day.
Obama has been nailed in ‘Obama Nation’ on a lot of stuff he wrote in his book, like his supposed story in Life magazine about the black man who tried to whiten his skin. Total fabrication. Now the Obama-cons are desperate to accuse McCain of the same thing, even if they have to make it up themselves.
I worded that poorly and my years where off (five instead of seven). I was thinking of the third volume of The Gulag Archipelago which was released here in 1978 and was what folks where originally using to accuse McCain.
If the left keeps this up they will sucessfully run everyone in the center off with their insults and outright lies. Keep talking folks and watch for those tiny bluespots you will have created on the electoral map come November!
Partly my mistake as well. I had forgotten that there was such a long time between the volumes appearing. Funny, it doesn’t seem that long ago. :-)
Well, that proves it. Never happened to Solzhenitsyn. So it couldn't have happened to McCain.
You know, Georgia. The 58th state.
Yep. Obama will announce it at the convention.
The irony of this is that McCain’s ‘cross story” is NOT the issue.
The issue is that McCain has values and ethics and character that have stood the test of time! They were there when he was a POW and he has the SAME ethics, values and character NOW!
I wouldn’t care if McCain was delusional with torture and pain during that time and “hallucinated “ the Cross episode.
It doesn’t matter. And THAT is what the left doesn’t get when they go after “the story”.
Next thing you know they will say that somebody before Jesus did the ‘writing in the sand when an adultress was brought forth” first and Jesus just stole the idea!
What matters is the real life experience of McCain and his character that comes through a hundred of his ‘stories” and more so , his actions.
I read “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denesovich” back in 1963 or ‘64.
Funny you should use that example. There are only three passages in the bible that were not in the original documents. The passage about the prostitute and let he who is without sin . . . is one of those three. In most bibles, if you check, you will find that fact footnoted.
It was added hundreds of years later.
Liberals might want to sue the guard for violation of separation of Church and State: the camp was government property. Liberals would never allow the display of the cross on the ground at an American school.
HA! didn’t know that...there you go.
“ There are only three passages in the bible that were not in the original documents. The passage about the prostitute and let he who is without sin . . . is one of those three. In most bibles, if you check, you will find that fact footnoted.”
That story belongs right where it is. Augustine noted it was sometimes omitted from texts because of ‘prudery”—most likely because the pharisees are hinting in that chapter that Jesus was illegitimate (since there was known to be something unusual about his birth—like, why did his parents sneak away to Bethlehem after his wife was pregnant before their marriage?)
Had Jesus said the woman taken in adultery should have been punished, then their next remark would have been, ‘So, how about your own mother, then?’
John’s gospel and John’s Revelation parallel one another (portraits of the Bridegroom and the Bride), and that story is paralleled in Revelation (where the accusers in both books are cast out).
PWNED KOS! socialist liar radicals.
Interesting... Is there nothing the left won’t try? They are getting pretty dang desperate aren’t they? (and I couldn’t be happier, really...).