Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Liberal Fascist Alert): Canada's 'Human Rights' Revolution
Real Clear Politics ^ | August 20, 2008 | David Warren

Posted on 08/20/2008 7:44:14 AM PDT by Publius804

August 20, 2008 Canada's 'Human Rights' Revolution By David Warren

In the time since I last wrote on the topic, Canada's various "human rights" kangaroo courts have publicly retreated on several fronts. Several ludicrous cases, brought against Mark Steyn's writings in Maclean's magazine, Ezra Levant's editorial judgements in the (now defunct in print) Western Standard, and Fr Alphonse de Valk's in the magazine Catholic Insight -- have been dismissed by the tribunals. This, after more publicity had been given to the cases than the human rights bureaucracies felt comfortable with.

It should be mentioned that none of the defendants got off easily. Each was compelled to spend large amounts of money and time in the extremely aggravating process of dealing with large, faceless bureaucracies, staffed with their political enemies, functioning free of traditional legal restraints. By dismissing each case, after long drawn-out proceedings, the kangaroo courts were able to run up their chosen victims' costs, while finally denying them the possibility of an appeal against judgment to a legitimate court of law, in which they might conceivably have recovered their expenses. "The process is the punishment."

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; humanrights; liberalfascism; marksteyn

1 posted on 08/20/2008 7:44:15 AM PDT by Publius804
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Great, well written article.


2 posted on 08/20/2008 7:56:31 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Islam: Imagine a clown car.........with guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Canada’s law is a disgrace and it is being abused by the fullest extent possible. Of course we are not all that far away from getting something like that in this country.


3 posted on 08/20/2008 8:28:17 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

BUMP!


4 posted on 08/20/2008 8:38:37 AM PDT by Publius6961 (You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Uh, how does one become a “liberal fascist”? Isn’t that like being a jumbo shrimp, or a chaste prostitute?


5 posted on 08/20/2008 8:41:28 AM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

A liberal fascist is a left wing nut case who uses or relies on fascistic government bureaucracies to achieve their left wing aims. Like this kangaroo court in Canada.


6 posted on 08/20/2008 8:43:45 AM PDT by Publius804
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

Actually “liberal facist” is a redunacy. The facists were liberals and behaved in remarkable similar ways to the present practioners. Painting facists as right wing was an attack tactic of the communists and was enthusiastically embraced by the American Left only after Hitler invaded the Soviet Union. Prior to that, the American Left were firm advocates of the Fascist movement.

Read Jonah Goldberg’s excellent book: Liberal Fascists. It will give you the willies.


7 posted on 08/20/2008 8:51:50 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

“A liberal fascist is a left wing nut case who uses or relies on fascistic government bureaucracies to achieve their left wing aims. Like this kangaroo court in Canada.”

And how is that “fascist”? Communism, thought to be the polar opposite of fascism, did the very thing you mention.

My gripe is that this term is used as a term of attack instead of something that actually describes what is happening. Fascists used the tactics described... but so have communists, monarchs, and even democracies. Therefore, it is not a “fascist” thing.

Now, if you’d have said, “Orwellian” I might agree.


8 posted on 08/20/2008 8:52:45 AM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

From the Wiki site:

Fascism is an authoritarian nationalist political ideology and mass movement that is concerned with notions of cultural decline or decadence, and which seeks to achieve a millenarian national rebirth by exalting the nation or race, as well as promoting cults of unity, strength and purity.

Various scholars attribute different characteristics to fascism, but the following elements are usually seen as its integral parts: nationalism, corporatism, militarism, authoritarianism, populism, collectivism, statism, dictatorship, and economic planning. In addition, Fascism opposes conservatism, liberalism and communism.


9 posted on 08/20/2008 8:58:26 AM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
To qualify the header.

A small l liberal is much more likely, indeed certain to be a socialist in general terms.

National Socialist German Workers Party. (NSDAP)

Give a socialist power and certain tendencies will surface. I remember the socialist party in England, when they were brought into a coalition government. The communist newspaper, the Daily Worker, decried the war- pre Hitler's invasion of Soviet Russia.

Herbert Morrison, the for the people, by the people, workers unite crowd, a socialist, closed the newspaper down. He later dumped on the London Daily Mirror for a mere cartoon, scared the editor with threats. The Mirror toed the line after ward- no fools they.

Pierre Trudeau of Canada was the Liberal Party leader. Some writings were accessed against fervent opposition, in recent years. He had written these at the age of twenty years.

He was a budding fascist- by these writings, 'til the war gained credibility with the general public. Then he kept his mouth shut and left the country for a while.

10 posted on 08/20/2008 9:01:42 AM PDT by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804; GMMAC; Clive; exg; kanawa; conniew; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; ...

11 posted on 08/20/2008 9:01:59 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

fascism & communism aren’t polar opposite they are both forms of socialism & are therefore inbred kissing cousins.


12 posted on 08/20/2008 9:54:34 AM PDT by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson