Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nmh
In the majority of situations that is TRUE a burden that interrupts their normal lives.

The people you see on the street aren't people who have occasional issues with depression or mild forms of bi-polar disease.

They're people with serious mental illnesses, many of whom have a substance abuse problem, who can be very dangerous to their families. These families have had to make the difficult choice between trying to help the mentally ill person, or ensuring the safety of other family members. I'd hate to be in a position where I'd have to kick out an uncle or a sibling to protect my kids, but I can't blame people for doing so- unless you're talking about a rich family that can afford full-time, professional care for a dangerous mentally-ill relative, what choice do they have?

79 posted on 08/21/2008 11:33:17 AM PDT by Citizen Blade ("Please... I go through everyone's trash." The Question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: scan59
unless you're talking about a rich family that can afford full-time, professional care for a dangerous mentally-ill relative, what choice do they have?

Didn't grandpa Kennedy lobotomize his daughter because she was an embarassment? A state institution would have been better.

80 posted on 08/21/2008 11:36:14 AM PDT by scan59 (Markets regulate better than government can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson