The pyramid blocks were almost certainly poured; you’d waste 80% of the material trying to carve them, even if you had the infinite time and manpower to do it. Wagons full of stone from quarries were hauled to the site and emptied into frames, and then some sort of liquid bonding agent was poured into the frame and topped off. The close fits of the blocks are from the use of the frames and not from carving with infinite resources.
Anytime you pour slurry to make something there will be spillover. Is there evidence of this anywhere?
Considering that the building stone geology (under a microscope) in the pyramids is strongly in tune with the makeup (particle alignment, etc.) of the surrounding virgin stone from the queries, I doubt “pouring” was the method used. Just MHO.
I don’t suppose finding the quarries from whence came those blocks means anything. or the tool marks of the workings on those stones?
“liquid bonding agent”? Maybe epoxy? Redi-mix from Home Depot? Alien technology? Dino dung?