Posted on 08/23/2008 6:02:01 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
After hearing about Barack Obama's ties to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Fr. Pfleger and the militant activists at ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), it should be clear to everyone that his extremist roots run deep. But Obama has yet another connection with the world of far-Left radicalism. Obama has long been linked - through foundation grants, shared political activism, collaboration on legislation and tactics, and mutual praise and support - with the Chicago-based Gamaliel Foundation, one of the least known yet most influential umbrella groups for church-based "community organizers." The same separatist, anti-American theology of liberation that was so boldly and bitterly proclaimed by Obama's pastor is shared, if more quietly, by Obama's Gamaliel colleagues. The operative word is "quietly." Gamaliel specializes in ideological stealth, and Obama, a master student of Gamaliel strategy, shows disturbing signs of being a sub rosa radical himself. Obama's legislative tactics, as well as his persistent profession of non-ideological pragmatism, appear to be inspired by his radical mentors' most sophisticated tactics. Not only has Obama studied, taught, and apparently absorbed stealth techniques from radical groups like Gamaliel and ACORN, but in his position as a board member of Chicago's supposedly nonpartisan Woods Fund, he quietly funneled money to his radical allies - at the very moment he most needed their support to boost his political career. It's high time for these shadowy, perhaps improper, ties to receive a dose of sunlight. The connections are numerous.
(Excerpt) Read more at nrd.nationalreview.com ...
History of the Movement: This type of community organizing began in Chicago in 1938. Saul Alinsky created the "Back of the Yards Community Council". The organization operated in the shadow of Chicagos stock yards. The community was beset with poverty, political corruption, gangs, disease, deteriorating housing and inadequate schools; but most of all it was beset with a sense of powerlessness. The organization successfully engaged people to change the conditions of the community. Its motto was, "We shall decide our own destiny." And to a large extent and for some time, they did just that. Many organizations were created utilizing the model of the Back of the Yards Council. Unfortunately most of those organizations have dissolved, become stagnant, parochial and marginalized; have evolved into social service, advocacy, or economic development corporations; or have become the fiefdoms of political hacks. The original mission of empowerment and expansion of democracy has, all too frequently, been lost. To insure the promise of community organizing, the Gamaliel Foundation was born. History of the Gamaliel Foundation: The Gamaliel Foundation was originally established in 1968 to support the Contract Buyers League, an African American organization fighting to protect homeowners on Chicagos Westside who had been discriminated against by banks and saving and loan institutions. In l986, the Foundation was reorganized as an organizing institute providing resources to community leaders in the efforts to build and maintain powerful organizations in low income communities. The Gamaliel Foundation has grown from three to more than forty-five affiliates in seventeen states and in three provinces of South Africa. The Name: The first Christians were a threat to the establishment of Israel. The Sanhedrin met to decide the fate of the leaders of the new religion. Some wanted to kill them. But the wise man Gamaliel stood up and said "refrain from these men, for if this work be of men, it will come to naught, but if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it, lest haply ye be found even to fight against God." Acts 5: 38, 39. We work in the hope and the confidence that this work is of God. Paul understood himself to be a disciple of Gamaliel. (Acts 22:3) Saul Alinsky made all of his organizers read the letters of Paul because he regarded his namesake to be one of the greatest organizers of all time. The Gamaliel Foundation mentors organizers. |
This article requires a subscription. When did NRO start that?
Another one? Good Grief!
We need to see The One’s passport records. How much time has he spent in Manchuria?
Given Obama’s background, I don’t see how you could conceive of him as anything but a radical left-winger.
I don’t know exactly when, but it’s certainly been for several years. It’s not just National Review but more and more magazines — e.g., Weekly Standard, -now do this. In my opinion, the reason is that management doesn’t want NRO to be a substitute for the magazine, which is far more detailed and varied than what appears on the Internet. Also, many articles appear in the magazine which are never even seen on NRO. I think the one I’ve posted is an example.
I agree totally. There’s NO WAY any objective observer could reach any other conclusion. I’m still in a state of shock that this total nonentity and empty suit - after one vapid and stupid speech at the DNC - could suddenly become a SERIOUS contender for President of the United States. God, help us. I know this sounds like a lot of hyperbole but I’m serious. Are people truly AWARE of who and what he truly is?
Not only that, but as Jerome Corsi and others have pointed out, his birth certificate and college records have all “mysteriously” disappeared. I’m not a believer in cosspiracy theories but there are more unknowns about this candidate than any other in American history. And the liberal MSM is deternined not to let us pursue any leads or facts that might bring us closer to the truth. Sometims I forget that we’re not talking about a school board election but the presidency of the United States!
That is the first time I have ever run into that clicking on the link to a NRO article on Free Republic. Oh well, you can’t really blame them I guess.
Anyone who is a subscriber to NR magazine can post articles that appear in the maqazine. People forget that NRO and NRO digital are two very different things. There are subjects that the magazine deals with in much greater depth and length than appear on NRO, such as the one I just posted. This is true of all magazines now - Commentary, Weekly Standard, etc.
BUMP FOR TRUTH!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.