Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"States throw out costly electronic voting machines"
Associated Press ^ | 19 August 2008 | Deborah Hastings

Posted on 08/24/2008 5:29:09 PM PDT by lifelong_republican

"...vanishing votes, breakdowns, malfunctions and increasing evidence that the devices were vulnerable to hackers..."

(Excerpt) Read more at ap.google.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: america; american; ballot; ballots; diebold; electronicvoting; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
The unreliability factor alone makes electronic 'voting' systems a taxpayer ripoff. The Optical scan devices are also hackable.

Civic minded elementary school children could do the counting in front of the public with superior affordability, reliability, security, and accuracy.

Representation in government is THAT important.

1 posted on 08/24/2008 5:29:10 PM PDT by lifelong_republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lifelong_republican

Holy Hanging Chads Batman!


2 posted on 08/24/2008 5:34:02 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lifelong_republican

After what happened in Florida in 2000 with the hanging chads with computer punch card voting, so many places were eager to go to electronic voting. Now we see that there are problems with those machines too.

There has never been a perfect vote count in any election. The punch cards probably were the best that we can do, as far as accuracy, plus having a ready made audit trail available in case of re-counts. How do you do a re-count of electronic voting where there is no paper trail?


3 posted on 08/24/2008 5:35:54 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lifelong_republican

Now if we can only convince “concerned voters” to wake up, get out of bed, clean themselves up, go to the polls, show an I.D. and complete a paper ballot ON ELECTION DAY, we’d be getting somewhere. All this electronic and mail-in crap is nothing but voter fraud. If they care about America, make them exert at least a little energy and effort when we are deciding who is going to run this country.


4 posted on 08/24/2008 5:37:07 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (A History and Science Minute.- "Climate change" has been going on for millions of years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lifelong_republican
If those voters are too stupid to operate hole punch what on earth made anyone think they could operate a computer?

Texas is keeping its electronic voting machines. I don't think we've had any complaints.

5 posted on 08/24/2008 5:37:35 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teletech

The problem with the “hanging chads”
was real, but the problems with the
electronic blackboxes are orders of
magnitude worse.


6 posted on 08/24/2008 5:37:50 PM PDT by lifelong_republican (Real Americans: Real Ballots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lifelong_republican

I’m in Florida, the money we’ve wasted since the 2000 election, all because of the chads, is unbelievable.

First we had to do away with the punch card system that had worked well for years...before Gore decided to throw a hissy fit. (I told my husband that night...there will never again be a “normal” election because of this...always accusations of cheating.)

So we bought the electronic in our county, now the electronic are out, and we’re moving to optical scanners. Big bucks for a heavily populated county and betcha dollar to a donut, one day the punch cards will be back.


7 posted on 08/24/2008 5:39:42 PM PDT by Dawn531
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Our electronic machines have a paper print out that you can verify prints what you chose on the touch screen. Works great.


8 posted on 08/24/2008 5:39:44 PM PDT by DaveArk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

FlingWingFlyer you make a great point
about encouraging voters to go to the
polls, preferably informed. Even the
voters who are physically disabled
should be represented in government.
Some people are working their two or
three jobs and some employers don’t
offer sufficient time off to vote.


9 posted on 08/24/2008 5:40:43 PM PDT by lifelong_republican (Real Americans: Real Ballots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dawn531

Dawn531 you are right about the Florida
fiasco being inexcusable. It boils down
to voters being prevented from voting.
The optical scan devices are hackable.


10 posted on 08/24/2008 5:43:34 PM PDT by lifelong_republican (Real Americans: Real Ballots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DaveArk

A printout doesn’t actually have to
correlate with a transmitted tally.


11 posted on 08/24/2008 5:44:26 PM PDT by lifelong_republican (Real Americans: Real Ballots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lifelong_republican; Dilbert San Diego
Optical might be hackable but it is still auditable and recountable.

Our Florida county had optical equipment in 2000 and our recounts were consistently accurate. Our Supervisor of Elections was very good, well respected throughout the state but his advice fell on deaf ears in the RAT counties anxious to spend OPM on the flashy stuff. As a taxpayer I'm outraged.

12 posted on 08/24/2008 5:44:59 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Rest In Peace, Capt. Ed "Too Tall" Freeman (1928-2008))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

everybody gets a specially marked marble as they enter the polling place. You go into the booth and drop the marble into the box of the candidate you want to vote for. The one who has the most marbles in his box wins.


13 posted on 08/24/2008 5:49:33 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Optical is definitely hackable
(one example is the Hursti Hack).
You’re right about the possibility
of audits or recounts, but they are
not done sufficiently often. You’re
also right about the Democrats being
outrageous abusers of the voters and
the taxpayers forcing the defective
systems on the public. They broke
a lot of elections laws to deny
voters real ballots, especially
in such states as Pennsylvania.


14 posted on 08/24/2008 5:50:14 PM PDT by lifelong_republican (Real Americans: Real Ballots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lifelong_republican

the stories about hackable electronic devices are myths being propogated by the people who’d rather not see technology applied here. the people who’d rather be able to manipulate a stack of handrwitten ballots.

we’ve had ATM machines for decades, direct deposit for some time, electronic filing.

over 99% of money exchanged is done electronically.

we can’t figure out how to count votes without widespread fraud? give me a break.


15 posted on 08/24/2008 5:57:44 PM PDT by bluedressman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lifelong_republican

At the last city I was in, they had electronic ones and I loved it. Just put in the card, hit 2 or 3 touch screen buttons and hand back the card.

Simple and fast.

Here you have to make marks on paper which takes awhile and then put them in a scanner which electronically records it anyway.

I prefer the visual feedback from the touch screen. You put the paper in this other type thing and all it says is ‘vote recorded’.


16 posted on 08/24/2008 6:02:15 PM PDT by MartinStyles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluedressman
the stories about hackable electronic devices are myths being propogated by the people who’d rather not see technology applied here. the people who’d rather be able to manipulate a stack of handrwitten ballots. we’ve had ATM machines for decades, direct deposit for some time, electronic filing. over 99% of money exchanged is done electronically. we can’t figure out how to count votes without widespread fraud? give me a break.

Excellent point. I was about to post a similar comment then read yours. I do most of my banking online, and have never been "hacked". As an ex-computer expert(retired) I would rather place my faith in a computerized voting machine then in paper ballots that can suddenly be "found" to add to the recount, which happened in 2000 and again in 2006 in Washington state.

17 posted on 08/24/2008 6:15:08 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lifelong_republican

In 2000, the whining, emotional, unthinking liberals demanded those voting machins that worked just like ATMs...

And it was evidence of racism that the poor and minority communities “Dodn’t Have Them” which was a big joke because a study by two university profs found that rich white suburbs were the most likely users of “inferior” punch card machines.

Now they have a new whine...about the problem they created. HOW LIBERAL!


18 posted on 08/24/2008 6:17:00 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Fire the CIA and hire the Free Clinic, someone who knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluedressman

It’s the computer scientists and security experts
who’ve pointed out the flaws and vulnerabilities
in the voting systems.

The ‘voting’ systems are inferior to the ATM systems,
and the ATM systems have had numerous problems, too.

There is a lot of good information out there if you
take the time to look for it.


19 posted on 08/24/2008 6:18:14 PM PDT by lifelong_republican (Real Americans: Real Ballots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lifelong_republican
Civic minded elementary school children could do the counting in front of the public with superior affordability, reliability, security, and accuracy.

Republicans who think that humans can count more reliably than machines remind me of Democrats who think that wind can power the United States. The disconnect between the science and the reality is so great that the mind boggles.

Most humans can't correctly count the number of times the letter 'F' appears in a sentence.


20 posted on 08/24/2008 6:18:30 PM PDT by Nick Danger (www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson