Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chatter over Hutchison as possible VP pick gets louder
Houston Chronicle ^

Posted on 08/27/2008 6:45:58 AM PDT by Bulwinkle

CRAWFORD — Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison's long-shot prospect for vice president is getting a push from conservative and other pundits in the lead-up to next week's Republican National Convention.

The latest flurry of speculation online and on cable television constitutes at least a third or fourth wave of chatter about Hutchison, whose name surfaces occasionally as a possible Republican vice-presidential candidate...

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 110th; 2008veep; hutchinson; mccain; tx2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221 next last
To: Grams A

I agree. If he picks a pro-abortion VP candidate, he will lose the millions of evangelicals. McCain doesn’t care, he is blinded by the current polls.


41 posted on 08/27/2008 7:00:23 AM PDT by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ontap
Kay Baily Hutchinson leans toward pro choice.

She does more than lean - she IS pro choice, by her own words. There is no doubt or middle ground.

If McCain picks her, he will lose a lot of conservative votes.

42 posted on 08/27/2008 7:00:31 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

the snow on the roof crowd is already a lock for McCain (except those in AARP who epitomize BDS)

People will look at McCain’s VP as the person who can and will run this country if aged Senator Mccain sadly becomes incapacitated or dies. With a candidate this old and with his health history, we cannot tolerate a tokenism selection, especially an old one. Would anyone even mention KBH if she was a man?


43 posted on 08/27/2008 7:00:55 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

We don’t need two Senators and we especially don’t need two old Senators. McCain is 72 years old...he needs a bona fide conservative who’s young and ready to step in if needed. I don’t see Kay Bailet Hutchison in that light...at all. Nice lady, I’m sure but not what we need right now.


44 posted on 08/27/2008 7:01:03 AM PDT by pgkdan (Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
Hutchinson is pro-abort. She has no governing experience, and she's old. Not to mention a woman.
45 posted on 08/27/2008 7:01:08 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle
I'm not a big Hutchison fan but as a VP pick it would be smart. She's a slightly right moderate who has no baggage and did I mention, she's a woman.
46 posted on 08/27/2008 7:01:11 AM PDT by tobyhill (fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Add Hutchinson to the list of candidates who would add nothing to the McCain campaign, and might even hurt a bit. That list also includes Romney, Powell, Rice, Huckabee, and Lieberman.

McCain needs a bold, younger choice. Cantor, Palin, Steele, or Sanford. Not the guy who came in number two, or a bunch of “moderates” and liberals.


47 posted on 08/27/2008 7:01:20 AM PDT by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste

bs... no hair dye..... I think


48 posted on 08/27/2008 7:01:28 AM PDT by dennisw (That Muhammad was a charlatan. Islam is a hoax, an imperialistic ideology, disguised as religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
“The Hutchison amendment gives DHS virtually total discretion over how and where the fence is built,” says Grassfire.org President Steve Elliott. “In fact, DHS would not be required to build fencing in any particular location -- and the double-layer mandate is totally gone.”

Not sure I understand this bill. From what I am reading, this would give Homeland Security jurisdiction over the fence. Grassfire says this 'may' allow them to choose not to build it, but that is a 'what-if' game, not actually written in the bill. Wouldn't it be better to have this in the hands of Homeland Secuirty than under the jurisdiction of congressmen whose allegiances change at a whim? Isn't this a Homeland Security issue? Maybe I am reading this wrong, but what Grassfire is saying isn't actually in the bill, they are just saying 'what if'.

49 posted on 08/27/2008 7:01:32 AM PDT by mnehring (http://www.new.facebook.com/group.php?gid=26012226159&ref=mf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

She’s a decent enough lady but doesn’t strike me as the sharpest knife in the chandelier. An obvious consequence of that is she could really drag team McCain down in debates, I’m afraid.

I’d much rather he select a rising star VP candidate. It’s doubtful there is too much to this rumor because McCain’s team has been making all the right moves up to this pt and surely wouldn’t slip up now with this looming critical decision.


50 posted on 08/27/2008 7:01:44 AM PDT by Dysart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

If McCain wins, it will be because people voted against Obama.


51 posted on 08/27/2008 7:01:48 AM PDT by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

Hutchison’s pro-choice. Otherwise, I like most of her positions on the issues of concern and she’s got both legislative and executive experience.

Colonel, USAFR


52 posted on 08/27/2008 7:02:12 AM PDT by jagusafr ("Bugs, Mr. Rico! Zillions of 'em!" - Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

For someone that ALWAYS has so much common sense, you have really missed it this time.


53 posted on 08/27/2008 7:02:16 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

Kay isn’t pro-abortion, see #32.


54 posted on 08/27/2008 7:02:17 AM PDT by mnehring (http://www.new.facebook.com/group.php?gid=26012226159&ref=mf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
persuade him that HIS BASE IS NOT SHORED-UP.

Those after-Biden/after-Convention polls showing McCain even or slightly ahead do bode well for Conservatives.

They give McCain the impression that he can still win without playing to the Conservatives. Where else are they going to go anyway?

[I still expect McCain to pick a VP who is an obvious finger-in-the-eye to Conservatives.]
55 posted on 08/27/2008 7:02:19 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle
Kay Bailey Hutchison's voting record on Abortion

Voted YES on defining unborn child as eligible for SCHIP. (Mar 2008)

Voted YES on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion. (Mar 2008)

Voted YES on barring HHS grants to organizations that perform abortions. (Oct 2007)

Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Apr 2007)

Voted YES on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. (Jul 2006)

Voted NO on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives. (Mar 2005)

Voted YES on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime. (Mar 2004)

Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life. (Mar 2003)

Voted YES on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions. (Jun 2000)

Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions. (Oct 1999)

Voted YES on banning human cloning. (Feb 1998)

Rated 7% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)

Rated 75% by the NRLC, indicating a mixed record on abortion. (Dec 2006)

56 posted on 08/27/2008 7:03:06 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucas McCain
Palin would be better.

Good in the future, but too green.

Palin for Sec. of Interior.

57 posted on 08/27/2008 7:03:12 AM PDT by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Thanks mn, that is what I was going to post.

I do feel that if Mac were to pick a woman he would have this election won!


58 posted on 08/27/2008 7:03:12 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (umm, - that decision, ummm, is above my paygrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway

cowboyway:”Would definitely get all those pissed off Hillary supporters.”

Would definitely pissed off Hillary!!!!!!!


59 posted on 08/27/2008 7:03:27 AM PDT by Bulwinkle (OBAMA: The least experienced, the least qualified to be President of ALL the speakers at the DNC!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

If McCain wins it will be because he has kept himself acceptable for those who want to vote against Obama—among both our base and moderates.


60 posted on 08/27/2008 7:03:27 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson