Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest

Has she ever issued an explanation of that vote and squared it with her other pro-life votes? I can think of one and only one explanation that might be acceptable but I’d like to hear hers first.


4 posted on 08/27/2008 1:53:12 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Michelle Obama is the only woman in the world who can make Hillary look warm and cuddly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded
Dear NonValueAdded,

What's to square?

Someone can believe that abortion is a “right,” and should generally be legal but still believe that the government may put restrictions on it, such as against partial birth abortion, or for parental notification, or for waiting periods.

The bottom line is that Sen. Hutchison voted for a sense of the Senate amendment affirming that Roe was rightly decided and that there is a constitutional “right” to abortion.

And that was in 2003.

The thing is that the federal Congress seldom addresses the principal issue - should abortion be generally legal? Is abortion truly a constitutional "right"? Most of the votes taken by congresscritters related to abortion are regarding peripheral issues, not central to the primary issue - is this really a "right"?.

Her “pro-life” costume comprises voting on peripheral issues on abortion.


sitetest

5 posted on 08/27/2008 2:01:46 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson