“When a conservative former Fort Detrick public affairs officer, and a liberal activist opposing Detrick’s biolab expansion, agree that Bruce Ivins was not the anthrax killer...”
there is no logic in this leading statement, which makes me think the whole article is junk.
George Bush and John Kerry agree we should spend $50 billion on AIDS in Africa. Does this make it right?
“When a conservative former Fort Detrick public affairs officer, and a liberal activist opposing Detrick’s biolab expansion, agree that Bruce Ivins was not the anthrax killer...”
“there is no logic in this leading statement, which makes me think the whole article is junk.”
Yea, you’ve got a good point there.
Is it then fair to say that you believe that Ivins WAS the anthrax mailer?