“Militantly anti-choice?” Sounds a lot more sinister than “pro-life,” doesn’t it?
No, this article is as harsh as the NYTs could manage less than 4 hours after the pick was announced.
I’m afraid many on our side are becoming like the abused stepchild - we’re beside ourself with gratitude when the ol’ man (the media) hits us 9 times instead of the usual 10.
They've also started calling her an "abortion foe." You know, take the two ugliest words in the English language, "abortion" and "foe," and use them to describe a woman who unabashedly favors "live baby" as the preferred outcome of pregnancy.
Oh! And the article also said Palin wishes to "remove abortion protections." Protections. I did a double-take at that.
It's Roe vs Wade that "removed" protections, meaning removed any state law that protected women and babies from abortion. I guess they're talking about "protecting" the pro-abortion law? So the law will live and the babies will die?
It is truly astonishing what these twisted minds do to corrupt honest language.