Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50

He started back in February.


210 posted on 08/31/2008 11:43:29 AM PDT by beckysueb (Drill here! Drill now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: beckysueb
He started back in February

Actally, that seems to be false. It look more like there was no vetting whatsoever:

The same source states later on (my emphasis):

Apparently, McCain's campaign lied when it said "on Monday that Ms. Palin was 'thoroughly vetted,' a process that would have included a review of all financial and legal records as well as a criminal background check." [same source for all quotes]

Now it turns out that Ms. Palin was

She belonged to a separatist (i.e. Anti-American!) political party in the 1990s! Do I want her to be my vice-president and a even a president (by default)? Hell no!

It has now been days after she has been picked for the Republican VP spot that McCain had a

Why would that be necessary if sh had been "thoroughly vetted" to begin with?

How "throughly" was she vetted?

Not very thoroughly by any standards it seems.

So, where do you get your information from? Or did you just make that up about February?

256 posted on 09/01/2008 11:17:57 PM PDT by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson