The democrat party is 100% pro-abortion - 100% all abortion all the time, 100% state-paid abortion at all times - even past delivery (per Obama’s own preference to kill living babies accidentally delivered alive).
The republican party DOES respect life, and (fortunately) has had pro-life planks in their platform for many years. You are (sadly) confusing “women's rights” (in general) with “requiring abortion be state promoted” - which is, of course, the NOW position. THEY are the ones who hate and oppose Palin for being pro-life, despite the fact that she Palin is more a more successful “woman” than any NOW member.
“... per Obama’s own preference to kill living babies accidentally delivered alive ...” Actual, RC., abortionists were inducing labor and not even trying to kill the infants as they were being born at some abortuaries, just leaving the struggling preemie to die a slow death set aside in a vomit tray or sink or—as in the case of where Jill Stanek worked—left in a soiled linen room to die, eventually, alone and unattended. And THAT is why so many pro-lifers are outraged that this Obama marxist dead-soul could be the golden boy of the democrap party. It is also why 98 of 98 United States Senators present at the reading of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act signed on to the bill in passage and the wording was exactly like the wording in an IL bill Obama worked to prevent making it to law in the state where he was a state senator before becoming a U.S. Senator. He ahsn’t a clue the evil he defends and promotes and that makes him extremely dangerous.
Assuming the Republican Party is, say, 50%, what difference does it make to the aborted fetuses?!?
I have nothing nice to say about NOW. I am also not opposing Palin. I never mentioned any opposition to he rpolitically. I simply question her judgment, not her faith, character or political saviness. It doens't inspire confidence in me that she is the person to be potentially in a position to decide to press the button or not.