Yes there is a cultural war, and one of its manifestations is the great difference in the mental and physical attributes of the women politicians that each respective culture produces.
1) Generally speaking Republican Women tend to be well balanced in their work, a working balance between ideology of service and skilful means. That is they have a balance between Hat and Cattle.Sarah Palin exemplifies this balance.
2) Democrat women generally are Utopian, their ideals tend to rule their work and also constrict the implimentation of policy they formulate from their ideology.They tend to be all Hat and No cattle. Nancy Pelosi exemplifies this along with such politicians as Barbara Boxer.
Inside of a hierarchy, Republican women do very well, and excell in accomlishment. Democrat women excell at cranking up emotion in their fellows and in their electorate, but tend to have great difficulty in accomplishment.
In many ways this is also true of the differences between Democrat and Republican men, but it is especially noticable in the fairer sex.
The American public tends to vary in electing these sterotypes, depending in the existing conditions and issues which drive elections.Right now very extreme conditions present them selves to the public here in the United States, politically, socially and economically. This is because those conditions have mostly , been created by the MSM.
The MSM has created fear and concern in the American public, painted doom and gloom, which drives the US public to choose politicians who are from the Republican stereotype.
In other words the MSM has created conditions which will MAKE americans choose Republican culture.And this includes denying the more liberal RINO politicians of the Republican party , and chossing Democrats over RINOs who appear more functional in terms of balance.The RINO revolution inside the Republican party is therefore not particularly useful in this election cycle.In fact it works to confuse the US public.
SO in this culture war election, the politicians naturally disposed to do well are Republicans. It is this fact which many have overlooked, and augers very well indeed for the Republican cause. It is also the reason that you see Democrat politicians suuch as Clinton and Obama, trying to belatedly produce impressions that they are moderate candidates with "experience." Their history of voting and experience tells the lie.
Single issue voters will tend to vote Republican. Prediction: Republicans win in Nov. 2008, both in Congress and the presidency.
And the INFURIATION of the Dems over Palins nomination is simply because she is demonstarbly skilful in her politics, and in her home life.And her skill covers a wide range of tasking, from motherhood, to hunting, to exercising the power of office.She also has the balance most Dem women do not. Therefore she earns the respct of women like Clinton, but earns fear and derision from women like Pelosi, who see her as an emotional defective, ie not enough HAT.
This makes for a HIGH POPCORN factor of entertainment, as we see the dynamic of culture play itself out. This engages very high voter turnout, a good thing for America.
Pelosi in the Saddle: All HAT EMOTICON( 9% public approval skill level)
Palin in the Saddle: Balanced Hat/Cattle ( 83% public approval skill level in Alaska):
NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE IN BODY LANGUAGE
No wonder the DEMS are infuriated by the selection of Sarah Palin.
