Thank you for the reply. I’ve now been able to identify some of the pictures you show from other places, but can’t determine who had what, first, and frankly, no one seems to be able to actually claim this girl is Sarah.
As I now look at your own blog, you’ve now corrected yourself with an update (Update 4) saying the girl isn’t Sarah, but her “soon-to-be sister-in-law.”
Thanks for the correction there.
Rather than “Sarah,” I meant, obviously, Bristol.