Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CE2949BB

I understand removing a questionable fella away from the action if he had a gun on his hip. But charging him with “disorderly conduct” seems unecessary. If it was legal to carry the gun in plain sight, there was no threanening behavior, and he cooperated with the police, what was disorderly about it?


4 posted on 09/01/2008 10:28:33 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane

Yep. He broke no laws.

However...those of us who carry would rather that no one knows that we are carrying.

To our advantage.


6 posted on 09/01/2008 10:39:31 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Tublecane

“But charging him with “disorderly conduct” seems unecessary.”

They have to charge him with something to justify removing him from the area...or tasing/shooting him.

I’m not sure what the “disorderly conduct” threshold is, but I’d guess in some circumstances it’s not immediately doing whatever the nice officer tells you to do.


9 posted on 09/02/2008 12:44:23 AM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson