If they are so confident, why not argue the merits instead of a technucality?
If they are so confident, why not argue the merits instead of a technucality?
***Good question. In fact it’s one of those questions that is likely to be the sort of thing that we ask later, “why didn’t anyone follow up on that?” It is an indicator. Something is askew with this entire thing and I can’t put my finger on it. So, to take your approach, it is likely that they are not all that confident. I cannot understand why, other than the fact that it was only a “sense of the senate” rather than established law and so there is a hatch that is not battened down and it’s flapping away like crazy. No one wants to go near it.