Key documents:
Talk about cutting off the scandal at its knees!!
That’s a Republican for you.
Democrats try to subvert and they definitely threaten people.
She’s good. She’s very, very, good.
This lady has a set made of brass.
Go Sarahcuda!
Yes, she has a sharp spine and the elites underestimate her at their peril.
They have set the bar pretty low with the way they have treated her. VP Palin could simply hit a single and come out looking better than portrayed.
That being said, I expect their to be late night meetings at Barack’s NBC and CNN HQ’s to regroup.
I have been thinking about this one. If this guy really tasered an 11 year old while off duty and made death threats, I would hope ANY politician would express concern about keeping him on the payroll regardless of him being a relative/ex-relative.
Palin ping!
This is actually pretty smart, politically. By requesting the investigation herself, she shows she has nothing to hide. Also, this investigation has to be done by an independent investigator. The investigator appointed in the Legislative investigation is known to have ties to Moneghan (sp?), and the Dems have already ordered the investigator to refuse to cooperate with the lawyer for Palin.
If the Dem running the investigation continues to refuse, then the McCain/Palin ticket can credibly claim that it is a partisan witchhunt by Obama supporters. It will also force all of the evidence into the public, not just the damaging bits that the Dems want released.
>>Talk about cutting off the scandal at its knees!! <<
I hate to be the negative voice here but...
Highly political investigations can run wild and go into all kinds of personal things. One may not like Bill Clinton but remember the Whitewater investigation of Hillary that would up investigating whether President Clinton left a stain on a dress?
Does it sound like this dispute is headed to court?
It’s obvious that the RAT Senator in charge of the legislature’s “investigation” has but one goal: to get out a report damaging to Sarah a few days before the election.
With all the broo-ha-ha about her, do you think that the dems would be interested in investigating the past of some of their people? Like Kennedy? Kerry? Edwards? To name a few.
She has forced their hand in AK.
hehehe...it just gets better and better.
Now I've gotta double the donation when I get off work.
...maybe I'll do it RIGHT after her speech!
WHAT AN AWSOME IDEA!!!
GIVE THE GOP A CLEAR MESSAGE!
Right after Sarah's speech everyone make the GOP donation they planned on making anyway.
They'd figure it out real quick!
hehehe.
like I said...better and better
I don’t think I could love this woman anymore than I do right now.
We actually have a fighter. A real fighter. Hot damn.
There is nothing more insidious to liberals than turth.
This is a good call on the part of Sarah Palin.
This was done after she hired an attorney in the matter (probably at the behest of the campaign committee, as I suggested yesterday), so i wouldnt get too carried away that it was solely her decision, especially since it was not done prior to retaining legal counsel.
When i read the affidavit that was posted here earlier this morning, i noticed that provision that mandates referral of a possible ethics violation to the proper authority, and noted how the fired PSC had NOT done so, which is significant, imo.
this present filing is certainly pro-active and pre-emptive, and is a good move on her attorney’s part.
Evidently domestic violence is suddenly a private matter and no one’s business. That is, unless it’s against a democrat woman and her family.
Is lucky the "Heath sisters" didn't just shoot him, then have him stuffed and put above the fireplace.
If Bob files a complaint against herself, while Charlie uses his office to quash investigations, that shows that Charlie is an honest person (since investigations against him have finished without finding anything) while Bob is a crook (where there's smoke, there's fire).