Skip to comments.
Viva la Evolution?
CreationOnTheWeb ^
| September 3, 2008
| David Anderson
Posted on 09/03/2008 3:47:09 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-196 last
To: tacticalogic
"It's your assertion. You are the only one who knows what "type" you were talking about when you made the assertion. If you can't remember, I can't help you." I was referring to the same 'type' that you used to make the equal and opposite claim. If you can't remember, I can't help you.
181
posted on
10/22/2008 5:45:21 AM PDT
by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: GourmetDan
I made no reference to “type”. It was a question with regard to a specific statement. The statement was copied from your post, and presented along the question. If you don’t want to answer it, then say so outright and be done with it.
182
posted on
10/22/2008 5:49:09 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: GourmetDan
Projecting methodological naturalism back into unobservable, extrapolated time and events is based on philosophical naturalism.That's your opinion. I don't agree with it.
183
posted on
10/22/2008 5:51:22 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
"I made no reference to “type”. It was a question with regard to a specific statement. The statement was copied from your post, and presented along the question. If you don’t want to answer it, then say so outright and be done with it." And I responded with the ant-type of your specific statement, which is just as valid as your comment. If you don't want to answer, then just say so outright and be done with it.
184
posted on
10/23/2008 5:42:45 AM PDT
by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: tacticalogic
"That's your opinion. I don't agree with it." Well that's your opinion and I don't agree with it.
185
posted on
10/23/2008 5:43:20 AM PDT
by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: GourmetDan
And I responded with the ant-type of your specific statement, which is just as valid as your comment. If you don't want to answer, then just say so outright and be done with it.How do I know that? You haven't produced the specific statement of mine that you submit is the "ant-type", whatever the hell that is.
186
posted on
10/23/2008 6:21:26 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: GourmetDan
Well that's your opinion and I don't agree with it. Then I believe we're done.
187
posted on
10/23/2008 6:22:26 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
"How do I know that? You haven't produced the specific statement of mine that you submit is the "ant-type", whatever the hell that is." You can't figure that out? I only changed one word in your statement and reflected it back to you.
188
posted on
10/23/2008 3:31:18 PM PDT
by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: GourmetDan
I only changed one word in your statement and reflected it back to you.Indeed. And you think that's how to have a discussion. That's why we're done.
189
posted on
10/23/2008 4:09:30 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
"Indeed. And you think that's how to have a discussion. That's why we're done." Indeed. And you think that reflecting your non-sequiturs and misrepresentations back at you is no way to have a discussion yet your initial use of them is completely reasonable.
190
posted on
10/24/2008 5:55:15 AM PDT
by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: GourmetDan
That’s simply another opinion I disagree with. I have no more interest in discussing it with you.
191
posted on
10/24/2008 6:11:16 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
"That’s simply another opinion I disagree with. I have no more interest in discussing it with you." You already agreed that I had merely changed one word of one of your vacuous arguments and reflected it back to you and therefore we were 'done'. Now you say it is merely my opinion that it's OK for you to use non-sequitur and misrepresentation but not OK for me to reflect them back to you. Which is it?
192
posted on
10/27/2008 6:03:46 AM PDT
by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: GourmetDan
What part of “I have no more interest in discussing it with you” do you not understand?
193
posted on
10/27/2008 6:12:31 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
"What part of “I have no more interest in discussing it with you” do you not understand?" The part where you use non-sequitur and misrepresentation as argument and run away when I reflect it back to you.
194
posted on
10/28/2008 5:45:20 AM PDT
by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: GourmetDan
You can have the last vitriolic word.
195
posted on
10/28/2008 5:59:55 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
"You can have the last vitriolic word." I believe that the last vitriolic word was yours, from post #186.
"How do I know that? You haven't produced the specific statement of mine that you submit is the "ant-type", whatever the hell that is."
196
posted on
10/28/2008 6:07:36 AM PDT
by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-196 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson