[GourmetDan]

"Lewinton says all scientists are atheists. They aren’t so he’s wrong. Whether ID is or isn’t science doesn’t depend on that, so it can still be wrong."

You previously defined scientists such that anyone who believes in supernatural creation was not a scientist.

Now you say that scientists can believe in a supernatural creator. This would mean that a scientist who believes in ID can be a scientist and ID is science.

Which is it?

[tacticalogic]

You previously defined scientists such that anyone who believes in supernatural creation was not a scientist.

I didn't do that, you did. When I pointed out that not all scientists are atheists, you said I don't get to include them.