FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
The Great Global Warming Swindle Video - back on the net!! (click here)
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
Good Catch
God bless him in his new endeavors
And the problem with that is???
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
The Great Global Warming Swindle Video - back on the net!! (click here)
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
More and more people, gathering in the finest circles, are recognizing CRAP (CLIMATE RELATED ADVOCACY POLITICS)as dangerously overprevalent and legitimized sans adequate vetting.
People prefer fiction rather than truth.
It is NOT a religion, and heretics who say otherwise should be burned at the stake!
We'll take him in Oz on a straight swap with ours (he's like Obama, but a real rock star)
It is very easy to debunk the claim that it is “scientific fact” that man is causing “global warming”. All that is required is to refer to the following fundamental principle of science -
“ONLY EXPERIMENTAL DATA HAS THE POWER TO SHOW CAUSE.”
This is the basis of the scientific method and is not debatable.
Note that climatologists have NO EXPERIMENTAL DATA and will not have any anytime soon. Without experimental data, no reasonable conclusion can be obtained.
In order to produce experimental data on the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, the experiment would have to be performed at the same scale as the Earth’s atmosphere! Obviously that’s not going to happen.
Global Warming proponents have only observational data. A corollary to the above states:
“OBSERVATIONAL DATA CAN NEVER BE USED TO SHOW CAUSE, ONLY ASSOCIATION.”
I wonder how many “global warming” advocates know the difference between “cause” and “association”? The difference is of course vast.
As a scientist I have examined the theories and methods used by global warming proponents. It is nothing short of appalling to see their “scientific work”.
