Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LadyNavyVet

I’m glad you quibbled, LNV. I prefer to be accurate.

Excellent post. Thanks.


55 posted on 09/08/2008 9:17:27 AM PDT by xzins (ZerObama: zero executive, military, or international experience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

I’ve been playing with my calculator, and my best guesstimate is that Ras is currently understating McCain’s support by somewhere between .85 of a point and one full point due to the rapidly changing partisan identification numbers (i.e., not taking into account sampling error or any other way that error can be introduced.)

This is not to imply in any way that Ras is TRYING to understate McCain’s numbers. To the contrary, Ras bends over backwards to get it right, but knowing when one is right is impossible in polling, at least until November 4th.
Rolling averages are a time-honored method of reducing statistical noise. That is why he is using them.


58 posted on 09/08/2008 9:26:18 AM PDT by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson