Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin fumbles on Fannie, Freddie
Chicago tribune ^ | Sept. 8 08 | Frank James

Posted on 09/08/2008 2:22:19 PM PDT by Rennes Templar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-176 next last
To: Mr. Silverback

I do not think I indicated that I wanted to throw the Palin overboard because she did not know that the “Pledge of Allegiance” was written around 1890 as opposed to prior to 1776. However, I did say that I was disappointed in her misunderstanding of such a vital part of our American History and cultural fabric.


81 posted on 09/08/2008 3:00:00 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

It was advertised since last Thursday that the Feds (taxpayers) were going to bail them out.


82 posted on 09/08/2008 3:01:37 PM PDT by tobyhill (fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
Sheesh...you would think that Palin said that there were 57 states or something!

She didn't error on this issue...Even back it 2003, these two government-backed behemoths were referred to as costly to the taxpayer:

http://michellemalkin.com/2006/12/19/crackdown-on-fannie-mae-corruptocrats/

Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae each receive $2.25 billion lines of credit with the U.S. Treasury. These special pipelines give the institutions an implied federal guarantee available to no other private sector competitors in the mortgage market. That protection makes them immune to the costs normally associated with riskier and riskier behavior. Moreover, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not required to pay state and local income taxes. In addition, the standard for how much money the government requires them to keep on hand in case homebuyers default on their mortgages is lower for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae than for fully private banks and thrifts. The two corporations receive an estimated $10 billion a year in hidden taxpayer subsidies.

Palin was right, AGAIN, Obama campaign (and you were wrong AGAIN)!

83 posted on 09/08/2008 3:01:44 PM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Lady
The DUmmies are fizzing like crazy over this too.

MM is correct, this is no gaffe. They are too big, they should never have allowed just two institutions to carry that much of the nations debt.

They are too expensive. They are putting a lot of other financial institutions at risk and affecting lending in worldwide markets. They have to be stabilized (expensive)

NO GAFFE. Sheesh....

84 posted on 09/08/2008 3:01:51 PM PDT by blasater1960 ( Dt 30, Ps 111, The Torah is perfect, attainable, now and forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Didn’t we pour some money into them back during Clinton?
Jamie Gorelick was involved.


85 posted on 09/08/2008 3:02:31 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
Economists and analysts pounced on the misstatement, saying it demonstrated a lack of understanding about one of the key economic issues likely to face the next administration.

Sarah 'got it wrong' as a matter of historical fact, but with the government bailout it is the taxpayer that is on the hook going forward -- and that's really all that matters for the next administration.

86 posted on 09/08/2008 3:02:55 PM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Lady

FIGHT BACK AND SEND AN EMAIL TO FRANK AND HIS BOSS AT THE WASH DC OFFICE ABOUT THIS HUFF POST SPIN

FRANK - FJAMES@TRIBUNE.COM
BOSS - NDENDAVID@TRIBUNE.COM


87 posted on 09/08/2008 3:03:17 PM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
the taxpayers on now on the hook for Fannie & Freddie.

Taxpayers have always been on the hook for them, this just makes it temporarily explicit until it's cleaned up. The "independent" management was fooling around with sub-prime paper outside their purview to pad their paychecks.

Sarah is correct to say that they had got too big for their britches and were putting the taxpayer at risk. I agree she could have said it more artfully. I expect she'll get a chance to illuminate her thinking on this at the debates.

-ccm

88 posted on 09/08/2008 3:03:54 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
Point out Jim Johnson, one of Obama’s VP vetters was CEO of Fannie when they were lending money recklessly.

Don't forget about Jamie Gorelick and Franklin Raines.

89 posted on 09/08/2008 3:04:11 PM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
She should turn this into what it is - since the Dims think the bailout is with the “government's” money, that illustrates they are out of touch and don't realize that the taxpayers finance the government.
90 posted on 09/08/2008 3:05:12 PM PDT by Heartland Mom (The Presidency is not an entry-level position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue

Agreed.


91 posted on 09/08/2008 3:06:42 PM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: nmh

But the easy credit-no money down” through reckless legislation” by the dems was absolutely DEMANDED so that all diverse groups(whether they could actually afford a home or not) could move into one and then have the taxpayers bail them out. Maybe I’m a little paranoid, but I have no doubt in my mind that this is what the socialist dems had in mind all along.


92 posted on 09/08/2008 3:07:42 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

BTW, what’d The Messiah have to say about the bailout?

Unscripted, that is?
Anything? Hellooooo, is anyone home at Chez Hussein?


93 posted on 09/08/2008 3:08:10 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D. - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kesg

Once again, Sarah has exposed the left’s ignorance. For years, economists have stated Fannie and Freddie were taxpayer-backed. Alan Greenspan and Henry Paulson have publicly stressed the government’s role in making sure Fannie and Freddie were funded.


94 posted on 09/08/2008 3:08:29 PM PDT by hsrazorback1 (To get what you had, do what you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nmh

it was not the no money down. they redid laws that essentially allowed INFLATED valuation to essentially BE no money down.

The fact these heavily regulated entities were failing IS an expense to the US ecconomy.

This is why the fed moves in on banks. The are in danger of failing.


95 posted on 09/08/2008 3:08:36 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
FDIC or the equivalent for mortgage lenders is supported by tax payers.
96 posted on 09/08/2008 3:08:44 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my McCain! GO SARAHCUDA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kesg

Oh, just wait. Ford, GM, and Chrysler are about to become “quasi” public/government companies.

To the tune of $25 billion. Their lobbyists snuck a clause in the energy bill authorizing Congress to approve this for “energy” improvements so they can meet the new MPG standards.

Now, they are readying to go to Congress for that money.


97 posted on 09/08/2008 3:10:29 PM PDT by papasmurf (I ain't your Daddy's Conservative, OK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Huffington has made it clear she is a left wing hateful lunatic. She was on a media panel at the start of the RNC convention, the venom she spewed was insane.

Huffinton is in the algore kool aid kook camp of “no debate allowed” on global warming.

The woman is insane with envy.

This is nothing of what is going to come from her.


98 posted on 09/08/2008 3:10:43 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

I believe that honest accounting by our federal government would have shown growing contingent liabilities with respect to the GSEs.


99 posted on 09/08/2008 3:10:53 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Learned a long time ago that there’s no such thing as a free lunch.

Not even for a Public Allies community organizer?

I think I once heard a certain infamous Chicago preacher saying something about "chickens coming home to roost".

And...in this liberal GSE mortgage "company" boondoggle, the chickens have certainly come home to roost for the taxpayer!

100 posted on 09/08/2008 3:12:58 PM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson