It cracks me up how any freepers let themselves start thinking of the National Inquirer as a real news source, simply because once in their lifetime they got some details right against someone we were happy to see fall.
The Inquirer prints salacious stories and covers itself by simply quoting what others tell them. Those others are anonymous and paid, and can say anything they want.
absolutely. they don’t even have to have any sources. “the first amendment” covers their trash.
i thought dems were for “the children”?
they obviously don’t care the emotional damage that they have inflicted on the Palin children.
Exactly. These "sources" may be some demented drug induced vermin sitting behind a keyboard spewing out ficticious slander on his blog. Whoever these "sources" may be, they are no different than those demons concocting another virus to infect your computer.
I don’t think that they are a “legitimate source”.
Almost always anon. sources. But this is another in a long line of smear attacks of which obami will not condemn.