Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fichori
"does that mean then that if I look up through my telescope and see pluto overhead it actually won't even be in the night sky at that time, but rather 102 degrees away from where I see it?" --mrjesse

Answer the question, yes or no.

I already did. It depends on "when" you look at Pluto. The 102º is close to the maximum angular disparity. If you want a precise yes or no answer you will have to answer my "when" question.

Are you prepared to answer my question? If not, why not?

1,082 posted on 09/18/2008 10:04:19 AM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1074 | View Replies ]


To: LeGrande; mrjesse
“I already did. It depends on "when" you look at Pluto. The 102º is close to the maximum angular disparity. If you want a precise yes or no answer you will have to answer my "when" question.

Are you prepared to answer my question? If not, why not?”
When?
How about right now!
(Or you could do the math and tell us the angular difference between Pluto's actual and observed position at 1200 GMT 09/18/08)

I think the real question of when is, when are you going to back this claim up with multiple external sources?

If not, why not?
Because the sun does not orbit the earth.

Thats why not.
1,084 posted on 09/18/2008 10:15:16 AM PDT by Fichori (ironic: adj. 1 Characterized by or constituting irony. 2 Obamy getting beat up by a girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1082 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson