Skip to comments.
Blizzard of Lies [PMS: Palin Maddness Syndrom]
nyt ^
| 9/12/08
| PAUL KRUGMAN
Posted on 09/12/2008 7:58:32 AM PDT by mathprof
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Bush derangement syndrome is being replaced by PMS--Palin Derangement Syndrome. I hope the CDC is working on a cure. This man needs help.
1
posted on
09/12/2008 7:58:33 AM PDT
by
mathprof
To: mathprof
Why are we posting Paul Krugman’s liberal rants? Does any one believe he is in the least bit relevant?
2
posted on
09/12/2008 8:01:06 AM PDT
by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: mathprof
Let’s see....lies have been replaced with lies, then those lying, keep lying about the new lies....then the next batch of lies comes along...then they start lying all over again......ain’t criminal liberalism beautiful???
3
posted on
09/12/2008 8:01:17 AM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: mathprof
Okay for people to lie about Palin, though. Paul, Paul, Paul. How far you have fallen.
4
posted on
09/12/2008 8:01:51 AM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(I'll tell you a little secret: we're smarter and more competent than the Left.)
To: mathprof
Where’s the barf alert??? That’s a triple-bagger.
Rules, people, Rules!!
5
posted on
09/12/2008 8:03:11 AM PDT
by
kimmie7
(3 cheers for my big brother the Major -- soon to be Lt. Colonel! My hero!)
To: mathprof
Perhaps Paul is upset because few believe the lies about Palin.
6
posted on
09/12/2008 8:03:13 AM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(I'll tell you a little secret: we're smarter and more competent than the Left.)
To: mathprof
Did you hear about how Barack Obama wants to have sex education in kindergarten...? theyre all claims recently made by the McCain campaign and theyre all out-and-out lies.
So Barack's voting record and the soundbites are all figments of our imagination? Sure, buddy. I have no idea about Hussein calling Palin a pig but voting for sex ed in kindergarten is verifiable. He's on tape supporting it and it's part of the voting record.
7
posted on
09/12/2008 8:04:48 AM PDT
by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
(Liberals: can't live with them, can't ship them to Syria.)
To: mathprof
The NYT hasn’t been concerned with or relevent to rational discourse (or even reality, for that matter) for years.
8
posted on
09/12/2008 8:04:49 AM PDT
by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
To: mathprof
Paul, this is just a trashy rehash of the truth trashed by ‘rats using hash. Can’t you just move on?
9
posted on
09/12/2008 8:04:58 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Palin for President! (PUMA))
To: mathprof
It’s okay. Let the NYTs keep these things on the national front page. They are doing us a favor. Come November 4th we get one of life’s greatests joys: WATCHING LIBERALS CRY IN DEFEAT.
10
posted on
09/12/2008 8:05:21 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: mathprof
The comments congratulating him on such a fine and fair opinion piece are hysterical. The people who agree with him are complete and total idiots. I am sorry to insult idiots.
11
posted on
09/12/2008 8:05:45 AM PDT
by
svcw
(http://baskettastic.com/)
To: mathprof
Krugman was way better when he sat behind the NYT the “subscription” wall.
Then, we never got to hear from him.
Oh for the good old days.
To: mathprof
Did you hear about how Barack Obama wants to have sex education in kindergarten, and called Sarah Palin a pig? Did you hear about how Ms. Palin told Congress, Thanks, but no thanks when it wanted to buy Alaska a Bridge to Nowhere? Sure did. Multiple times thanks to all the money McCain must have to run ads.
13
posted on
09/12/2008 8:13:02 AM PDT
by
Once-Ler
(had I meant it this way, she would be the lipstick. - still disgraceful)
To: mathprof
All stops have been pulled out in shilling for their messiah.
14
posted on
09/12/2008 8:13:11 AM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: popdonnelly
How far you have fallen.He hasn't fallen at all. He has always been the pond scum that pond scum wipes of its shoes.
15
posted on
09/12/2008 8:15:58 AM PDT
by
Maceman
(If you're not getting a tax cut, you're getting a pay cut.)
To: svcw
I would call them animals, but why give animals a bad rap?
16
posted on
09/12/2008 8:16:56 AM PDT
by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
(Liberals: can't live with them, can't ship them to Syria.)
To: mathprof
If anybody knows how to deal with a blizzard and a pack of wolves--it's the Governor of Alaska!
17
posted on
09/12/2008 8:17:25 AM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(The ruling Chinese oligarchy is the envy of the American Left.)
To: mathprof
“I spent much of 2000 my first year at The Times trying to alert readers to the blatant dishonesty of the Bush campaigns claims”
Shouldn’t that be, I spent much of 2000 - my first year at The Times - campaigning for Algore?
18
posted on
09/12/2008 8:25:04 AM PDT
by
Yogafist
To: mathprof
Pretty bold claims from a man who has an entire truth squad that constantly squashes just about everything he writes.
To: mathprof
Many liberals, of which Krugman is a good example as any, are no longer capable of distinguishing between the real world and the Alternative Universe Fantasy World they have created in order to explain away the abject failure of their socialist ideal.
They now interpret each and very news event through a shared prism of unreality, which bends light and truth into an array of colors and shapes more pleasing to their eyes and recognizable to what is left of their minds.
I believe the operative word for this condition is "delusional".
20
posted on
09/12/2008 8:36:44 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson