Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: andrew roman
It is here that Palin disappoints.

Sure, the Bush Doctrine may have “rung hollow” in the eyes of the Cato Institute’s Charles Pena in January, 2003, but it shouldn’t have kept Palin from “Understanding the Bush Doctrine,” as articulated by Noam Chomsky in October, 2004. Furthermore, her inability to summon the characterization of the Bush Doctrine as articulated by William Marina and David T. Bielo of the Independent Institute on December 9, 2004, both of whom explain that the Doctrine was actually fathered by Teddy Roosevelt a century earlier – a “pre-emptive imperialism,” as they described it – speaks volumes of Governor Palin’s inexperience.

It may actually be this century-old pre-emptive version of the Bush Doctrine, implemented decades before his birth, which Gibson spoke of in his interview with Sarah Palin.

And this woman wants to be Vice President?

Great satire!! Thanks for a good laugh!

28 posted on 09/12/2008 10:13:13 PM PDT by Lexinom (I don't want my daughters punished with an Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lexinom

Thank you for taking the time to read it!


29 posted on 09/12/2008 10:14:41 PM PDT by andrew roman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson