[Bishop_Malachi]

Sarah has single-handedly ushered out the “Sex and the City” era, and made the sexy new model for America a retro one — the glamorous Pioneer Woman, packing a gun, a baby and a Bible.

Ever notice how many liberal, kook women reference "Sex and the City". I do beleive that this is what pisses off people like Maureen Dowd the most. No longer is the self-absorbed, aborto-centrist feminist being lauded by most American women; Instead, an honest, loving, self-sacrificing, and tough woman has become vogue again.

[Islander7]

I tried watching “Sex and the City” a couple of times. I think a more appropriate title is “Sluts on the Make”.

Totally shallow, with no ‘redeeming social value’! (Anyone remember that line?)

[okie01]

Sarah has single-handedly ushered out the “Sex and the City” era, and made the sexy new model for America a retro one — the glamorous Pioneer Woman, packing a gun, a baby and a Bible. Since when -- and to whom -- is the "Sex & The City" image of womanhood superior to that of the Pioneer Woman?

Why would any woman prefer select the former as a heroine?

[conservativeharleyguy]

"...Sarah has single-handedly ushered out the “Sex and the City” era...".

It seems that most liberal pundits define their life/world views by the norms of some stupid movie or TV show. They constantly reference entertainment as if it's reality.

I suppose when you live in a fantasy world, complete with make-believe jobs, it all begins to seem real after a while.

None of them actually have to live the kinds of everyday lives that the rest of us do (even including those of their fellow party members who just happen to be regular, if misguided, folks).

Besides, while I can't confess to ever actually watching it, I thought the whole point of "Sex in the City" was how shallow and pointless the uber-feminist, narcissistic lives of the characters actually were until they rediscovered the greatness of the ordinary things in life.