So lets see. The two guys in the Senate who tried hardest to kill the bridge are crediting Palin, as did the democratic party in Alaska.
Yet to this very day, the MSM keeps telling us Palin is lying.
posted on 09/16/2008 6:27:23 PM PDT
If Dr Tom says it’s so, it’s so.
posted on 09/16/2008 6:31:43 PM PDT
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
I love you Dr. Coburn!
posted on 09/16/2008 6:32:00 PM PDT
('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
Thank you for posting the confirmation by Coburn.
posted on 09/16/2008 6:33:25 PM PDT
(Calling humans "pigs" is second-nature for anti-war radicals, Black Panthers + radical Islamists.)
Palin has been under attack by Democratic critics for initially supporting Stevens' earmark for the bridge in Ketchikan, Alaska, but later turning against it to align herself with the anti-earmark views of her running mate, GOP presidential nominee John McCain, the Arizona senator.
Don't you love the liberal media? As written, this reporter is either stating that Palin just changed her position after being picked for VP so as to "align" herself with McCain's anti-earmark position or Palin magically changed her position a year-and-a-half ago to "align" herself with McCain because she knew he was going to pick her.
Dear LMSM - you, along with your candidate, are going to lose.
posted on 09/16/2008 6:36:54 PM PDT
(Preserve Youtube Clips Before They Disappear - www.keepvid.com)
Way to go, Sarah! You go, girl. I love this woman. She is rising above the mud and looking good.
posted on 09/16/2008 6:38:46 PM PDT
by Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
but later turning against it to align herself with the anti-earmark views of her running mate, GOP presidential nominee John McCain, the Arizona senator.
This is a false statement by UPI. She was against it well before she was ever named McCain's running mate and well before McCain was even thought to be the presumptive nominee.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson