Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

“And the hardware for a local cache of a flat file structure shouldn’t cost more than $1000 or so [and that’s for new equipment - used equipment would be essentially costless]. “

let me get this striaght... you want to handel teh volume of post on FR with flat files? are you insane?


136 posted on 09/17/2008 11:39:49 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: N3WBI3
let me get this striaght... you want to handel teh volume of post on FR with flat files? are you insane?

If you're suggesting that they stick with the relational nonsense, then I'd question your sanity.

There is no known entity in all of computer science which is faster than a flat file structure, especially once it's been cached in RAM [and, better yet, cached at local ISP caching infrastructures throughout the nation].

Relational databases are death to efficiency.

142 posted on 09/17/2008 11:43:33 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson