Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amazon maps red, blue states
GoErie.com ^ | September 25. 2008 | AMY MARTINEZ

Posted on 09/25/2008 5:34:37 PM PDT by Vision Thing

Amazon.com has found a way to capitalize on one of the most interesting presidential elections in U.S. history.

The Seattle-based retailer introduced an interactive map of the U.S. showing which states are "red" or "blue" based on their online book purchases.

Although it's not meant to predict the next president, it suggests that the right's slant on the Obama-McCain matchup is more widely read than the left's.

For now, 36 states are pink or red. Six are blue. And eight, including Washington and Oregon, are purple, meaning residents are virtually split in their political book purchases between Republican and Democratic viewpoints.

(Excerpt) Read more at goerie.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amazon; bluestate; booksales; electionpresident; mccainpalin; redstate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 09/25/2008 5:34:38 PM PDT by Vision Thing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

Conservatives can read. Many libs can not.


2 posted on 09/25/2008 5:36:46 PM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing
interesting, but all that really proves is that Republicans buy more books (Or know how to read) from Amazon.
3 posted on 09/25/2008 5:38:57 PM PDT by txroadkill (Sarah Palin-- Vote for her?!? Hell, I want to marry her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

“Amazon.com has found a way to capitalize on one of the most interesting presidential elections in U.S. history...”

#####

I guess. I don’t particularly find the choice between a moderate Democrat and an openly racist class warfare Marxist to be particularly interesting.

More dangerous than “interesting”. A very treachersous time for our Republic.


4 posted on 09/25/2008 5:39:48 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

How many libs buy the books, just to have them on their coffee table or bookshelf, to look cool or seem hip, or maybe start an “enlightened” conversation?


5 posted on 09/25/2008 5:39:49 PM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Conservatives can read. Many libs can not.

That is uncalled for-you know the reason there aren't more blue states is that Amazon doesn't take food stamps. /s

6 posted on 09/25/2008 5:40:14 PM PDT by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Yup, libs tend to watch tv and movies. It’s much less effort for them than reading. That’s why tv and hollywood produce so much left-leaning stuff, whereas the book market is far more balanced.


7 posted on 09/25/2008 5:40:53 PM PDT by Vision Thing (obambi vs. McZilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

Proving once again that people who actually READ about politics vote Republican, people who EMOTE about politics and are “passionate” about their “issues” are democrats.


8 posted on 09/25/2008 5:44:05 PM PDT by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

I sell on eBay and I can tell you flat out. Liberal books don’t sell for squat.


9 posted on 09/25/2008 5:45:24 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (McCain Leads. Obama Phones It In.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

Really? Why? Can these jackasses just shut up and sell sh!t, please? Do we REALLY need every facet of our existence tied to this %@#$ing election? Is there ANY aspect of my life where I don’t have to process the names Obama or McCain?


10 posted on 09/25/2008 5:45:53 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (By Obama's own reckoning, isn't Lyndon LaRouche more qualified? He's run since the 70's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txroadkill
Interesting, but all that really proves is that Republicans buy more books (Or know how to read) from Amazon.

I wouldn't be surprised if libs mainly borrow books from the library. It sure doesn't support lib authors.

11 posted on 09/25/2008 5:46:05 PM PDT by Vision Thing (obambi vs. McZilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

One liberal scam is to publish a bunch of liberal books that nobody will read and then have libraries across the country buy them by the truckload.


12 posted on 09/25/2008 5:47:34 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (McCain Leads. Obama Phones It In.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
More dangerous than “interesting”.

Well, if you interpret "interesting" in the same way that the Chinese wish bad things upon someone by saying "May you live in interesting times", then dangerous and interesting are one and the same. :-)

13 posted on 09/25/2008 5:50:09 PM PDT by Vision Thing (obambi vs. McZilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing
Picture of leftist book club gathering...


14 posted on 09/25/2008 5:51:27 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing
The other day I was listening to a talk about networks where the speaker shows a network map of what book people read. The map shows that conservative readers read books that cite mostly other conservative books in the loop, while liberal readers read books that cite many more books outside the loop.

The speaker then argues that it shows conservatives' closed-networks of ideas that may be dangerous because they don't recevieve any new ideas. Meanwhile, liberals' networks of ideas are open. (Or, in the words of Ron Burt, they have many structural holes).

15 posted on 09/25/2008 5:53:52 PM PDT by paudio (Nobody cried 'racism' when Swann, Blackwell, and Steele lost to white guys in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

As a bookworm/junky, this is fascinating. It’s interesting to see what each state is reading. I need to go adjust my wishlist.


16 posted on 09/25/2008 5:54:11 PM PDT by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Conservatives can read. Many libs can not.

I think you are correct about that.

17 posted on 09/25/2008 5:54:21 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing
It's encouraging but I don't think too meaningful. I haven't bought any books, especially political books, for a long time. I'll wait and get them from the library or second hand, read what I need from the web.

So there will be more conservatives like me not represented there, but more importantly, many, many poor Democrats who don't buy political books and especially from amazon because they either aren't on the web or aren't too savvy about how to make online purchases, no cc, etc.

That wasn't meant as a putdown or racist as I make online purchases from different vendors, jumping through all the hoops to register, order and then checkout which can all be confusing and you have to watch what you are doing. Lately the only thing I purchased online were 3 asters because I don't know where I could have found that kind where I live. They cost a little more due to shipping but I get exactly what I want and start many others from seeds which is cheaper.

Now I'll check out the map again. It's all a trick, a push map :-). My state is clearly blue right now, not what they are showing. But it's fun and a diversion.

18 posted on 09/25/2008 6:02:15 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob
Proving once again that people who actually READ about politics vote Republican, people who EMOTE about politics and are “passionate” about their “issues” are democrats.

Well, I'm a bit torn about this dichotomy. Ever since Palin arrived on the scene, I've been very passionate about this election. And I cannot stop reading about the election on the Web. We'll definitely need a whole lot of passion on our side to win this thing in November.

But to agree with you, I'll say this: the issues that resonate with lib voters are mainly emotional issues: Hatred for Bush and Palin, mesmerized devotion to their obama, murderous zeal against the inconvenience of an unwanted baby, shall I go on?

19 posted on 09/25/2008 6:04:04 PM PDT by Vision Thing (obambi vs. McZilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Conservatives can read. Many libs can not.

Even if libs could read, there would be no motivation. They are usually wrong, but rarely if ever in doubt.

20 posted on 09/25/2008 6:07:39 PM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson