Posted on 09/25/2008 7:00:28 PM PDT by markedmannerf
I found one common tater that posted a "timeline for dummies" that, if you follow the hyperlinks, leads to some very comprehensive studies, of which I've barely scratched at.
My take is that the author/compiler leans to the left, but is more interested in gaining points by being accurate in deciphering WTH happened; http://seekingalpha.com/article/97427-the-dummy-s-guide-to-the-u-s-financial-crisis?source=more_author_recent_similar_articles
“(Pants on Fire, the fact-checking Web site PolitiFact.com wrote of Mr. Obamas advertisement invoking Mr. Limbaugh; False! FactCheck.org said of his commercial on Social Security.)
Well, imagine that. I’ve been following PolitiFact for a year now and, while I initially thought it was a cool concept, it’s decidedly, consistently Liberal - their choices of who they cover/target the most is VERY unbalanced. Always.
No, the post (#2) referred to “Michael Goldfarb”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.