Posted on 09/26/2008 2:52:04 AM PDT by americanophile
Yes, that is the leftist moral relativism. Nevermind probing deeper and actually understanding the monumental dimensions of the huge regulatory concern expressed by John McCain a few years ago. That was substantial and warranted further discussion. No, instead the dreg sets it aside and says what else has he done for us? Sometimes one concrete example is enough, like when Salk invented the polio vaccine, or Einstein the theory of relativity. So we would ask them what other papers did you write and publish? After all Professor so-and-so wrote 87 papers and you only wrote one! But who ever heard of Professor so-and-so?
“I have no reason to believe the questions asked of her, in the debate, “
No, debates are actually easier. They throw out a single “question” (more like a topic) and then the candidate answers. Then the opponent has rebuttal time. The moderator isn’t supposed interrupt with constant “follow up”. They key to “debating” is to pretend like you’re answering the question while puking out memorized talking points. That’s what Obama has been doing the past week, preparing for the debate with McCain - memorizing one-liners.
I don’t see it as a slip per se ari, she gave a too complete an answer.
IMO that is just a function of her not wanting to make an error.
They are spinning furiously to try to redefine the narrative about Gov. Palin. They know that the only chance they have to stop her is to sling as much crap as possible, in order to beat people down enough to start believing it. I believe they are students of a particular Nazi when it comes to propaganda.
..if the farmer was to do a Obambi work he would have needed another 6 acres to get in his ears
US have diplomatic talks at high level in Tehran this year.
This guy is not ready to be President nor VP
I would like to see her handlers fired though. She is being overdosed with talking points and it shows. I’ve seen her Alaska debates and older interviews on CSPAN and she’s really good. A natural.
It is like the 1984 election. In the first debate, Reagan did badly because he had been overly prepared and wound up. So for the second debate it was “let Reagan be Reagan” - they got rid of the handlers and he was just himself and he put Mondale and election away.
Take a break? She just got started! She is doing fine. She hasn’t said one thing harmful.
I just wish her staff would get more facts and figures for her, and she would have told Katie, for the third time, that “thankfully, there are NOT a lot of examples of Senator McCain advocating regulation, because as a conservative, John McCain is against government regulation, as a rule. We believe that the government should work FOR people, not strangle them. But, John McCain, in this fanny mae and Freddie mac situation showed that the needs of the country are always more important than ideology or partisan politics. He always puts his country first, and always will do what it best for the country.”
I have answered the question Katie.
I would like to see her handlers fired though. She is being overdosed with talking points and it shows. I’ve seen her Alaska debates and older interviews on CSPAN and she’s really good. A natural.
It is like the 1984 election. In the first debate, Reagan did badly because he had been overly prepared and wound up. So for the second debate it was “let Reagan be Reagan” - they got rid of the handlers and he was just himself and he put Mondale and election away.
Take a break? She just got started! She is doing fine. She hasn’t said one thing harmful.
I just wish her staff would get more facts and figures for her, and she would have told Katie, for the third time, that “thankfully, there are NOT a lot of examples of Senator McCain advocating regulation, because as a conservative, John McCain is against government regulation, as a rule. We believe that the government should work FOR people, not strangle them. But, John McCain, in this fanny mae and Freddie mac situation showed that the needs of the country are always more important than ideology or partisan politics. He always puts his country first, and always will do what it best for the country.”
I have answered the question Katie.
The only things she needs to take a break from are press interviews and press conferences. Those are on the media's turf and only the media wins. Palin needs to hit the campaign trail and continue with her fresh appeal on issues. No more interviews.
I would like to see her handlers fired though. She is being overdosed with talking points and it shows. I’ve seen her Alaska debates and older interviews on CSPAN and she’s really good. A natural.
It is like the 1984 election. In the first debate, Reagan did badly because he had been overly prepared and wound up. So for the second debate it was “let Reagan be Reagan” - they got rid of the handlers and he was just himself and he put Mondale and election away.
Cut down on the eyelash thickener, Katie!
How about interviews with local reporters, at campaign stops?
Her new handlers and advisors are indeed cramping her style. Just give her what she needs to know, and let her do the rest.
Does bear repeating!....;^)
I agree. They ought to be prepping her with facts only, not memorized responses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.