Palin urged to give up candidacy

The Star ^ | September 27, 2008 | Associated Press

[Raebie]

WASHINGTON

[staytrue]

If it is Sarah vs. Obama or McCain, she seems a little weak.

But frankly, Biden takes the weak idiot award going away.

Palin is 100 times better than Biden.

[FreeReign]

Kathleen Parker:Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League.

Apparently Parker bases her opinion on the the (LOL) Gibson interview and the Couric and Hannity interviews.

Parker offers only two examples:

Parker:Palin filibusters. She repeats words, filling space with deadwood. Cut the verbiage and there’s not much content there. Here’s but one example of many from her interview with Hannity: “Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to get into the issue that we’re talking about today. And that’s something that John McCain, too, his track record, proving that he can work both sides of the aisle, he can surpass the partisanship that must be surpassed to deal with an issue like this.”

When Couric pointed to polls showing that the financial crisis had boosted Obama’s numbers, Palin blustered wordily: “I’m not looking at poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of the day are going to be able to go back and look at track records and see who’s more apt to be talking about solutions and wishing for and hoping for solutions for some opportunity to change, and who’s actually done it?”

If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself.

Kathleen Parker is full-of-it.

[McGruff]

Misleading Headline Alert!

[bereanway]

Amazing what passes for conservative these days, eh. These are conservatives by moonbats standards. Noonan is another of these creatures.

[zeebee]

I think you are a troll. This line gives it away:

My father, a life long conservative republican, doesn't think she is qualified

[hosepipe]

Kathleen Parker = Ann Coulter envy with an Al Gore sized brain..

[Kickass Conservative]

Stand up Chuck!

[kenth]

Nub’s initial and only post so far includes, “life long conservative republican”, then in essence adds, “but...”

Yeah, I believe it. :P

[bereanway]

Yep, much ado about nothing

[tflabo]

We don’t care if she stumbles through ‘Rat infested interviews. She’s got the good conservative foundation
that’s important to her supporters.

[kenth]

Haha, you mean that clumsy attempt didn’t fool you? :D

[SuziQ]

So if Sarah Palin is really so awful as the Democrats are trying to tell us, then why would they want her dropped from the ticket? Wouldn't they, like us with Biden, refer to her instead as the "gift that keeps on giving?"

Excellent point, Sam!

[roses of sharon]

Troll bait threads are my favorite.

Very telling.

[1035rep]

I disagree. The more the liberals try to dump on Palin the more foolish they look. She has a favorable rating that exceeds both Obama and Biden.

[Kickass Conservative]

The only problem is, Sarah Palin is much more qualified than Barrack Obama.

He has been running for two years and I know more about Governor Palin than I do Barrack Obama.

The Media is an enabler of idiotic Liberals, nothing more.

[mockingbyrd]

Kathleen you ignorant slut!

[tflabo]

To the snively libtard marxists Sarah Palin is like a garland of garlic cloves draped around a cross.

[1035rep]

Troll bait threads are my favorite.

Mine too! After they're ID'ed you can follow them around the forum :)  I like the sleeper trolls the best.

Do you think we have more trolls this election?

[Recovering_Democrat]

All of a sudden the LameStream Media listens to conservative columnists?

Parker is wrong.

[so_real]

Palin has taken a defeated GOP, and put Republicans back in the fight.

That bears repeating. Let's not forget that prior to Palin's appearance on the scene, Obama pretty much had this election wrapped up.