Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBC News apologizes for web column attacking Palin
The National Post ^ | Sunday, September 28 | Melissa Leong

Posted on 09/29/2008 10:05:13 AM PDT by fanfan

CBC News apologized Sunday for publishing a column about Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin, conceding that it was "viciously personal."

More than 300 people complained to the CBC ombudsman about a column that ran on Sept. 5 on CBCNews.ca by award-winning freelance writer Heather Mallick.

The article, "A mighty wind blows through Republican convention," reportedly said Ms. Palin was chosen to appease the party's "rural," "unlettered" "white trash" base and said that the vice-presidential nominee looked like a "porn actress."

CBC News publisher John Cruickshank said in a letter that the public broadcaster erred in judgment. Vince Carlin, the CBC Ombudsman, did not fault Ms. Mallick for "the caustic nature of her tone or the polarizing nature of her opinion." "But he objects that many of her most savage assertions lack a basis in fact,"

Mr. Cruickshank wrote. "Mallick's column is a classic piece of political invective. It is viciously personal, grossly hyperbolic and intensely partisan. And because it is all those things, this column should not have appeared on the CBCNews.ca site."

The column was attacked by the National Post as well as Fox News. Ms. Mallick wrote: "[17-year-old] Bristol has what is known in Britain as the look of the teen mum, the ‘pramface.' Husband Todd looks like a roughneck; Track, heading off to Iraq, appears terrified. They claim to be family-obsessed while being studiously terrible at parenting. What normal father would want Levi ‘I'm a f--kin' redneck' Johnson prodding his daughter?"

As a result of the complaints, new editing procedures have been put in place "to insure that in the future, work that is not appropriate for our platforms, will not appear," Mr. Cruickshank wrote.

In his assessment of the complaints, Mr. Carlin also noted that cbcnews.ca displays a "very narrow range" on its ....

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalpost.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 09/29/2008 10:05:14 AM PDT by fanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GMMAC; Clive; exg; kanawa; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; Squawk 8888; headsonpikes; ...

2 posted on 09/29/2008 10:06:28 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

But I thought having a publicly owned media would bring objectivity!/sarcasm


3 posted on 09/29/2008 10:08:37 AM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

What’s the old punchline - I wouldn’t know what a porn actress looks like. Obviously, the writer of the hit piece does. Lets you know what she watches.


4 posted on 09/29/2008 10:09:07 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Greta got it right. She said that Mallick was, quite simply, a “pig”.

Actually, I think Greta was being kind.


5 posted on 09/29/2008 10:09:14 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Crocodile tears...


6 posted on 09/29/2008 10:11:50 AM PDT by Dallas59 (Just Say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Heather Mallick what does one expect from a direct offspring of Hitler or was it Stalin?


7 posted on 09/29/2008 10:12:03 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the Royal 100 Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

Hi Judy,

I haven’t seen you in ages.

Are we getting a majority this time?


8 posted on 09/29/2008 10:13:36 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Apologies are cheap and easy. CBC needs to take substantive action with regard to this plug-ugly (both physically and psychologically) person. Fire her now!


9 posted on 09/29/2008 10:13:54 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: YOUGOTIT

She looks more like the Chia Pet.


10 posted on 09/29/2008 10:14:57 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: laconic; Dallas59

Agreed.


11 posted on 09/29/2008 10:17:42 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Our mission is clear. Write to news outlets every time we see lies, bias and inappropriate invective.


12 posted on 09/29/2008 10:19:18 AM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

Yes. I wrote to the CBC myself over this.

They must have had thousands of letters, and emails.


13 posted on 09/29/2008 10:20:49 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

As one of the party’s “rural,” “unlettered” “white trash” base, I’d like to personally invite Heather into the belly of the beast, in the hope that she’ll be able to offer an informed opionion in future.


14 posted on 09/29/2008 10:30:35 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

>> “A mighty wind blows through Republican convention,” reportedly said Ms. Palin was chosen to appease the party’s “rural,” “unlettered” “white trash” base and said that the vice-presidential nominee looked like a “porn actress.”

I am neither “rural”, “unlettered”, nor “white trash” ... and she appeals to me. In fact, she appeals to this suburban, white-collared, doctorate-holding upper-middle-class citizen to a far greater extent than CBS News does.

As for her appearance ... I’d not dignify such bitter bile with commentary.

H


15 posted on 09/29/2008 10:31:28 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor (Keep Austin Quarantined ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
I am sure David Broder et al would not see that article as 'left wing bias' and are probably harrumphing over the inroads on first amendment rights caused by the reaction of this article.
16 posted on 09/29/2008 10:33:53 AM PDT by heywoodubuzzoff (McWhatshisname/Palin in 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic
Apologies are cheap and easy.

I agree, plus most people don't read them. But, what can you expect from a hack news organization that let Dan Rather get away with what he did. CBS news has zero credibility with anyone who still has at least one neuron still firing.

17 posted on 09/29/2008 10:34:05 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

Anyone out there who can find Heather Mallick’s e-mail address?


18 posted on 09/29/2008 10:36:18 AM PDT by Nick Thimmesch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: econjack
CBS news has zero credibility with anyone who still has at least one neuron still firing.

Meaning they are a respected news network with the majority of the Sheep.

19 posted on 09/29/2008 10:37:25 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Illic Est Haud Deus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hemorrhage; GoLightly

Same here.

I am a mother of two, own my own business, live in a rural setting, heat my home with wood only....

In my letter I told them that, and said I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for an apology, since I wanted to vote for Stephen Harper again, before I turned blue and died.


20 posted on 09/29/2008 10:38:37 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson