Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barack Obama wants to allow felons' votes, hamper military ones
Modern Conservative ^ | Brad O’Leary

Posted on 09/29/2008 2:12:10 PM PDT by connell

Obama Loves Our Servicemen – But Not Their Voting Rights
By Brad O’Leary

 
Many assume that the presidential debates help the public discern where each candidate stands on the issues.  If only this were true.  It is a most unfortunate irony that, much of the time, these made-for-TV sparring matches accomplish little more than to enable a candidate to pull yet another layer of wool over the eyes of John Q. Public.  A case-in-point from last Friday’s showdown is Barack Obama’s professed honor and concern for our men and women in the military.  Me thinks he doth profess too much.
 
“[W]e honor all the service that [our troops have] provided.  Our troops have performed brilliantly,” Obama told the nation on Friday night.  “The question is for the next president, are we making good judgments about how to keep America safe precisely because sending our military into battle is such an enormous step.”
 
Obama may claim to care deeply about the welfare of our troops, and say that the decision over whether or not to send our servicemen and women into combat is one that will weigh heavy on his mind, but unfortunately these are just words and platitudes.  The real Barack Obama, as his record shows, thinks so little of our men and women in the military that he would rather see their votes suppressed than counted.  In fact, he would rather secure the voting rights of convicted felons than those of our troops serving overseas.
 
Specifically, Senator Obama is the proud cosponsor of the deceptively labeled “Count Every Vote Act,” a bill introduced by Senator Hillary Clinton of New York.  This legislation is designed to override existing state laws and extend voting rights to over five million convicted felons who have finished serving their sentences.
 
In addition, this is little more than a publicly funded “get out the vote” drive for jailbirds.  Of course, it’s little wonder why Obama and his fellow hard-left partisans in the Senate want this bill.
 
As economist and best-selling author Dr. John Lott reminds us, “Virtually all felons are Democrats.”  According to Lott, from 1972 to 1996, 80 percent of felons would have voted Democrat, 93 percent would have voted for Clinton in 1996, and felons in Washington State “voted exclusively for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry” in 2004.
 
Not surprisingly, a clear majority of American voters oppose Clinton felon-voting bill that Obama supports.  According to a Zogby America poll, 54 percent of likely voters oppose the bill, while only 36 percent favor it (the remaining 10 percent are undecided).
 
While Obama is busy fighting to get more felons in the voting booths, he refuses to cosponsor the “Military Voting Protection Act of 2008,” which is also currently pending in the U.S. Senate. This bill was introduced based on congressional findings that “the ability of the members of the armed forces to vote while serving overseas has been hampered by numerous factors, including inadequate processes for ensuring their timely receipt of absentee ballots, delivery methods that are typically slow and antiquated, and a myriad of voting procedures that are often confusing.”
 
In addition, Congress found that members of our armed forces, as well as other U.S. citizens overseas, requested nearly one million absentee ballots in 2006, but less than one-third of these ballots were received by local election officials.  Clearly this is a problem and needs solving.  But not in Obama’s America.
 
In Obama’s America, states would lose their ability to govern and all felons would have their voting “rights” restored and protected.  States would also be forced to spend scarce taxpayer dollars driving felons to the polls.  At the same time, America’s bravest who are serving overseas would continue to have their voices suppressed, and many would continue to be denied an opportunity to help decide who their commander-in-chief will be.
 
Friday night showed once again that Obama is certainly capable of talking a good game, but as always, the devil is in the details – and the details hardly reflect Obama’s carefully crafted sound bites.
 
It is not a little ironic that a man vying to be commander-in-chief would work to secure the voting “rights” of convicted felons, but turn a blind-eye to the voting rights of the servicemen who might one day be under his command.
 

Brad O’Leary is the author of “The Audacity of Deceit: Barack Obama’s War on American Values.”  To learn more about the book, and Obama’s true positions on the issues, go to www.BarackObamaTest.com.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; felonvote; militaryvote; obama; obamatruthsquad; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: devolve

Obama couldn’t even make the Corps....Dastardly of him to wear a USMC t-shirt...He wants to usurp the Corps’ glory while disregarding the Corps’ sacrifices on the field...

He is unfir to be commander in chief...even unfit to tie the shoelaces of an average US Marine...He is a bum !

If he ever wins, i may wear a black armband in protest, just like the SDS punks did 45 years ago to protest out government’s policies...maybe it will be brown armband, so as not to be associate in any way with the SDS bums...


21 posted on 09/29/2008 3:11:27 PM PDT by billmor (Friday:Red Shirt Day- silent no more..,McCain and Palin-the right team for '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: billmor; potlatch

.

Obama voted against funding for our troops and for amoured vests and vehicles too

Yet in the debate he spun it with some BS leftie baloney

Sixteen (16) months Obama told Osama bin Laden during the debate.....


22 posted on 09/29/2008 3:29:42 PM PDT by devolve ((((((((((((((((Trust A Cokehead With Your Life?))))))))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: connell
As economist and best-selling author Dr. John Lott reminds us, “Virtually all felons are Democrats.”

Heh heh.

23 posted on 09/29/2008 3:30:22 PM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("It would be disgrace and humiliation if Obama does not win." -Woody Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; potlatch

.

Good post Phil

Obama “phoned it in” again this week to democrats in the House

Obama said before the vote today that he was not sure how he would vote on the Bailout Bill himself

But after the vote went South Obama blamed Senator John McCain for not getting enough Republicans in the House to vote “Yea”

House democrats were 13 short of voting for the Bailout Bill themselves - only 205 voted “Yea”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi fails as a leader and lied about being able to pass the Bailout Bill without Republicans:

“They told me they would get half of House Republicans to vote for the Bailout Bill!”

Did Barney Frank queer another deal again?


24 posted on 09/29/2008 3:43:43 PM PDT by devolve ((((((((((((((((Trust A Cokehead With Your Life?))))))))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Lol, did the pubs have a ‘straight reply for the queer guy’?
A sly reply for Pelosi’s lie.....


25 posted on 09/29/2008 3:53:05 PM PDT by potlatch ("OUR LIVES BEGIN TO END THE DAY WE REMAIN SILENT ABOUT THE THINGS THAT MATTER")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sturmde

The Omen trilogy IS fiction! I just wish we’d all wake up and find Obambi was just a nightmare with us all munching popcorn while we slept!


26 posted on 09/29/2008 4:07:47 PM PDT by missanne (If we lost the war in Iraq, who won?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: devolve; potlatch
I was shocked that so many Democrats voted against the bill.

Nancy Pelosi called the Republicans "unpatriotic" for not appearing at her secret meeting at an undisclosed location.

We have: Madame Speaker, the historic, shatterer-of-the-glass-ceiling, Year-of-the-Woman, pop-eyed Phantom of the Opera from Bathhouse-by-the-Sea absolutely ranting that the Republicans ate her strawberries.

We have: Harry "The Loser" Reid, whining that "a couple of hours of political theater delaying matters is no help"--!

We have: Hussein-my-baby-doo-wop crooning "I'll be there if-you-need-me, just call-me an-I'll-be-theeere"--

But, along with Barney Frank, their whole show fell down on its knees.

"Wascally Wepubwicans!"

When your opponent is churning deeper in the sand in that clown car--it is to laugh.

Thanks to the Democrat "leadership" for breaking the tension with slapstick.

27 posted on 09/29/2008 4:09:17 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Yup!

Not that there’s anything.....


28 posted on 09/29/2008 4:37:58 PM PDT by devolve ((((((((((((((((Trust A Cokehead With Your Life?))))))))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sturmde

This situation is intolerable.


29 posted on 09/29/2008 6:22:07 PM PDT by connell (I will not cease from mental fight, nor shall my sword sleep in my hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson