Barack Hussein Obama has gotten where he is today by disqualifying the opposition. It would be ironic, if he were disqualified now. That would be justice.
Ping.
This case is so interesting. It would be a very simple matter for Bambi and his handlers to simply produce the documents and put this whole matter to “bed.” The case would be moot and they would be able to point to “yet another smear debunked.” This would be an excellent opportunity for them to claim that they believe in transparency and keeping the public informed. And yet, they fight, the only logical conclusion is that there is something very damaging here that they are fighting tooth and nail to keep hidden from the public.
Berg’s papers appear well drafted and tightly written. His agruments appear on their face, persuasive. This is actually a case where getting a Clinton judge to hear the motion is a major plus! Here’s the top of the press release concerning Judge R. Barclay Surrick’s appointment.
For Immediate Release April 11, 2000
PRESIDENT CLINTON NOMINATES BERLE M. SCHILLER
AND R. BARCLAY SURRICK TO THE FEDERAL BENCH
I have no confidence that this case will be properly decided. If I were the judge, the first question I would ask the Bambi team is, “Why are you wasting my time. All you have to is show him the doc’s. What are you so scared of?” Then I would order from the bench that the doc’s be produced within 24 hours or face contempt. Then let Bambi’s team appeal the decision, if they dared.
So what's he supposed to say? "I'm pretty sure my case is going to be thrown out of court but what the heck? I tried."
Friday night 6:30 pm article from::::::::::
NORTHEAST INTELLIGENCE NETWORK
Status: Phillip Berg vs. Barack Hussein Obama
By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director
http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/
3 October 2008 To discredit the merits of the lawsuit and have it summarily dismissed, all Barack Hussein Obama (a/k/a Barry SOETORO)has to do is provide a legitimate copy of his birth certificate. The lawsuit was filed by Philadelphia lawyer Phillip Berg in late August.
Instead, Obama has opted to fight the lawsuit as illustrated in the federal court documents which can be viewed online HERE.
As they say, however, the devil is in the details...
First, it is notable that Barack Hussein Obama retained Washington lawyer Joseph SANDLER of the Washington law firm Sandler, Reiff, and Young to fight the lawsuit. Who is Joseph SANDLER? He is a lawyer who has represented CAIR - the Council on American Islamic Relations and MoveOn.org.
Last week, Obama and the Democratic National Committee filed a Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit. On Monday, Attorney berg filed a response to that motion, requesting (1) that the suit not be dismissed, and (2) that the Court order the production of documents that would validate Obama’s constitutional qualifications as a legitimate candidate for president.
As mentioned - the devil is in the details - well beyond the obvious (the obvious being a CAIR lawyer responding on behalf of Obama).
Over the last few days, there have been relentless Internet rumors that the court has dismissed the Berg lawsuit. As of this writing, that is untrue, and Attorney Berg claims that he is confident that the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss will be defeated.
Based on information I obtained confidentially from sources close to this case within the last 48 hours, it appears that the court will, in fact, dismiss this complaint. Unfortunately, the dismissal will be based on a series of obscure technicalities and citations, thus setting the stage for a larger constitutional crisis in the months ahead.
Count on it.